The most prominent issue discussed was the installation of windows at a property on Viscaya Avenue within the French Normandy Village Historic District. The homeowner faced complications due to the installation of windows that did not comply with the approved specifications. The windows were reflective with a green tint and featured incorrect mutton patterns. Despite multiple communications from city staff, the discrepancies persisted, leading to a debate over responsibility and resolution.

Homeowner Camela Pulla addressed the commission, emphasizing her commitment to preserving the historic character of her home and neighborhood. Pulla explained that although they had selected a vendor and proceeded with the permit application, there was a lack of guidance from city staff, contrasting with their previous experience with a roof replacement project. She and her representative argued that the installed windows matched those of neighboring properties and were reasonable based on the existing architecture. However, the commission questioned the homeowner’s understanding of the permitting process and the contractor’s decision to proceed with installation without the necessary approvals.

The discussion revealed that the contractor had ordered the windows before the permit was obtained, violating city guidelines. The commission expressed sympathy for the homeowner’s situation but emphasized that the contractor’s actions placed both the homeowner and themselves at risk. A board member remarked on the importance of adhering to the Secretary of Interior standards and expressed concern over the decision to install windows that did not match the permit drawings.

A motion to approve the windows with the condition of correcting the mutton patterns was presented but met with scrutiny and ultimately failed in a tie vote. Another motion to deny the design approval cited material misrepresentation and a need to adhere strictly to the ordinance. The homeowner expressed concern over a state funding deadline, highlighting the urgency of resolving the issue to avoid financial loss.

In another notable matter, the commission discussed a proposed addition to a historic residence on Sopeta Avenue. The applicant, Dr. Julia Perez, and architect Lester Perez presented their case, noting that previous city officials had approved a preliminary design. The current historic staff expressed reservations about the roof structure of the addition.

The board deliberated on the necessity of restudying the roof design. While some members supported the staff’s recommendation, others recognized the applicants’ reliance on prior approvals that had guided their design process. The applicants expressed frustration with the lengthy approval process. A motion was made to approve the addition with the conditions specified in the staff report, excluding the condition regarding the roof restudy, which was subsequently passed.