- FL
- Putnam County
- 12/11/25
- 12/11/2025
- 253 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent Palatka City Commission meeting primarily addressed community-focused initiatives, including the allocation of funds for affordable housing, the nomination of St. Mary’s Episcopal Church for historic recognition, and a comprehensive analysis of police staffing needs.
- FL
- Putnam County
- 12/11/25
- 12/11/2025
- 262 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During a recent Crescent City Commission meeting, attention focused on allegations of abusive behavior by the interim city manager, as well as the handling of these complaints. Additionally, discussions covered various topics, including the approval of a local mitigation strategy plan, zoning changes for mixed-use properties, and the management of heritage trees within the city.
- FL
- Putnam County
- 12/10/25
- 12/10/2025
- 110 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Putnam County Planning Commission convened to address a series of zoning map amendments. Notable cases included zoning changes aimed at facilitating commercial and residential projects, alongside discussions on the implications of recent state legislation on the planning process.
- FL
- Putnam County
- 12/9/25
- 12/09/2025
- 122 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Putnam County Council meeting was dominated by issues including public safety on Horseman Club Road, budget allocations for infrastructure and recreational projects, and the handling of public grievances. Residents voiced concerns over inadequate safety measures on Horseman Club Road, especially with a new school opening nearby, while debates continued over the financial prioritization of road improvements versus recreational developments such as the George’s Lake boat ramp.
- FL
- Putnam County
- 12/8/25
- 12/08/2025
- 71 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting of the Palatka Community Redevelopment Agency, much of the discussion centered around the funding and future of gas street lamps in the city’s South Historic District. Legal interpretations now suggest that Tax Increment Financing (TIF) funds cannot be allocated to recurring utility expenses, which has sparked a debate over the preservation of these historic gas lamps.