- FL
- Putnam County
- 1/7/25
- 01/07/2025
- 64 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Palatka Planning Board approved a zoning change to facilitate the development of a 68-townhome project, while also addressing several annexations to connect properties to city utilities. The meeting, held on January 7, 2025, was marked by discussions on infrastructure impact, community needs, and future growth.
- FL
- Putnam County
- 1/6/25
- 01/06/2025
- 113 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent Palatka City Commission meeting on January 6, 2025, marked a significant transition with the swearing-in of newly elected officials and acknowledgments of outgoing commissioners.
- FL
- Putnam County
- 1/2/25
- 01/02/2025
- 34 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Palatka Historic Preservation Board meeting on January 2, 2025, focused on approving historical markers for the Sherman Conant House and discussing their placement to enhance public awareness of the city’s historic districts. The board unanimously approved two markers, one at the house itself and another to be strategically placed along River Street.
- FL
- Putnam County
- 12/18/24
- 12/18/2024
- 57 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Crescent City Commission’s recent meeting focused on significant zoning changes, including the rezoning of 2011 North Summit Street for a new fire station and the transformation of 122 Central Avenue into a business zone. These changes are part of broader efforts to address community growth and development needs. The commission also discussed the implementation of a new setback requirement aimed at easing resident concerns.
- FL
- Putnam County
- 12/18/24
- 12/18/2024
- 62 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Putnam County Zoning Board meeting focused on a contentious appeal by Magnolia Dunes LLC regarding a proposed lot split of a 284-acre agricultural property in Palatka. The board ultimately denied the appeal, upholding the requirement for a minimum lot size of 10 acres on land that presents flood risks and conservation challenges. The decision hinged on density calculations, conservation easements, and state-imposed guidelines, with discussions reflecting broader issues of land use and environmental protection.