- Filters
- FL
- Putnam County
- 9/12/24
- 09/12/2024
- 264 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Crescent City Commission convened on September 12, 2024, with a packed agenda, notably focusing on the search for a new city manager following the announcement of Commissioner Charles Rudd’s departure for a new position elsewhere. The meeting also covered discussions on budget allocations, historic preservation efforts, and community safety concerns.
- FL
- Putnam County
- 9/12/24
- 09/12/2024
- 389 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Palatka City Commission meeting was marked by discussions on community development projects, financial oversight, and public safety. The most pressing topic was the proposed swap involving the River Center and the Consolidated Oil building, which raised concerns about financial stewardship, environmental liabilities, and community access.
- FL
- Putnam County
- 9/11/24
- 09/11/2024
- 45 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Putnam County Council meeting addressed updates, including the approval of the Mount Royal Air Park Phase 2 replat and key amendments to the county’s comprehensive plan, focusing on affordable housing and compliance with recent legislative changes.
- FL
- Putnam County
- 9/10/24
- 09/10/2024
- 230 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During the recent Putnam County Council meeting, discussions focused on innovative proposals and debates affecting various facets of the community. The council explored the creation of an inmate farm program to aid inmate rehabilitation and debated the financial implications of residential grinder pump fees. Additionally, the meeting addressed topics such as animal services, broadband expansion, and infrastructure maintenance.
- FL
- Putnam County
- 9/5/24
- 09/05/2024
- 87 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Palatka Historic Preservation Board convened on September 5, 2024, to discuss various matters related to the city’s historic district, with focus on the application for a certificate of appropriateness for the demolition of 426 Kirby Street. The board ultimately rejected the demolition request after a detailed and contentious discussion regarding the property’s condition and historical value.