Jersey City Historic Preservation Commission Approves New Residential Building in Van Vorst Park District

Overview: The Jersey City Historic Preservation Commission meeting on July 17, 2024, saw developments, including the approval of a certificate of appropriateness for a new four-story residential building on Bright Street in the Van Vorst Park historic district.

Bayonne City Council Approves Redevelopment Amid Traffic and Housing Concerns

Overview: During the Bayonne City Council meeting on July 17, 2024, several topics were discussed, including the approval of a redevelopment plan for properties on West 25th Street, concerns about affordable housing, and the implications of a new recreational facility for the community. Traffic and safety issues were also central to the deliberations.

Jersey City Zoning Board Reviews University District Building Renovation

Overview: In a recent meeting, the Jersey City Zoning Board focused on a key proposal for the renovation and conversion of a building in the University District into a 53-unit multifamily residential building, including a 10% affordable housing component. The project, which is not a permitted use under the current zoning, requires a use variance and has garnered attention due to its potential impact on the local community and its alignment with municipal land use law objectives.

Jersey City Council Debates Affordable Housing and Park Renovations

Overview: The Jersey City Council meeting addressed significant urban planning and community welfare issues, including contentious zoning resolutions for affordable housing and the long-awaited renovation of Pavonia Marian Park. The council also discussed the operational challenges of the Barry Lane Park splash pad, street closures and their impacts on traffic, and a potential federal prohibition on residential property purchases by large investment entities.

Hoboken City Council Faces Public Concerns Over Budget Amendments

Overview: In a recent Hoboken City Council meeting, proposed amendments to the 2024 budget sparked debate and public concern, particularly regarding the impact on property taxes and city services. The proposed changes, which included additional revenue sources and departmental adjustments, led to a divided vote among the council members and highlighted the community’s call for transparency and fiscal responsibility.