- MI
- Oakland County
- 3/10/25
- 03/10/2025
- 92 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During the Oak Park School Board meeting on March 10, 2025, attendees voiced concerns over student safety, community involvement, and the effectiveness of district programs. These concerns emerged amidst a backdrop of student recognitions and reports of educational achievements.
- MI
- Oakland County
- 3/10/25
- 03/10/2025
- 48 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During the latest Hazel Park School Board meeting, several topics were addressed, including a proposal to adjust the sick time payout structure for administrative staff, an increase in staffing for special education, and the search for a new athletic director. Additionally, the board discussed updates to various handbooks and potential policy changes.
- MI
- Oakland County
- 3/8/25
- 163 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Troy School Board meeting discussed the district’s financial challenges following the expiration of federal Emergency School Aid funds and explored strategies to address a projected budget deficit. The board focused on adapting to changes in funding sources, addressing the impacts of inflation, and maintaining a balanced budget amidst ongoing economic pressures.
- MI
- Oakland County
- 3/4/25
- 181 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent Troy School Board meeting focused on multiple issues, particularly the reevaluation of school start times in light of ongoing transportation challenges. Other topics included career and technical education initiatives, superintendent evaluation processes, and student feedback on school facilities and services.
- MI
- Oakland County
- 3/3/25
- 141 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: At its recent meeting, the Rochester Community School Board voted to postpone discussions about the future of the Caring Steps facility until March 17, citing the necessity for additional data and the absence of two board members. The decision to table the discussion was met with both support from board members and mixed reactions from the community, highlighting a divide over the facility’s financial viability and its role within the school district.