- Filters
- MN
- Carver County
- 5/4/26
- 05/04/2026
- 84 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During a recent Chaska City Council meeting, strides were made towards developing a new library and updating the downtown master plan. The council focused on approving key motions for both projects, emphasizing community engagement and strategic development.
- MN
- Carver County
- 4/27/26
- 04/27/2026
- 151 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Victoria City Council meeting focused largely on addressing downtown parking issues, with a discussion on the potential use of tax increment financing (TIF) to alleviate congestion. Additionally, the council delved into the development plans for Hunters Brook and Marsh Hollow Parks, examining budget constraints and design proposals. The meeting also included proclamations for Teacher Appreciation Week and Mental Health Awareness Month, as well as discussions on incorporating electric scooters into park facilities.
- MN
- Carver County
- 4/23/26
- 04/23/2026
- 72 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting, the Chaska Human Rights Commission addressed issues concerning immigration, particularly the distress caused by recent government operations affecting Asian-American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, alongside preparations for upcoming community events like Pride celebrations.
- MN
- Carver County
- 4/20/26
- 04/20/2026
- 119 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Chaska City Council meeting was marked by a celebration of the Chaska Hawks basketball team’s state championship victory and discussions about the local library’s future and community engagement.
- MN
- Carver County
- 4/13/26
- 04/13/2026
- 139 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Victoria City Council meeting was dominated by discussions on a proposed hotel development on Victoria Drive, which raised concerns regarding parking availability in the downtown area. Council members and the public debated the implications of losing parking spaces, necessary environmental reviews, and the potential benefits of the development, leading to a decision to table the proposal for further discussion.