- Filters
- MN
- Dakota County
- 12/8/25
- 12/09/2025
- 87 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Lakeville City Council meeting on December 8th focused on several issues, including an extensive update on the Lake Mary Greenway Trail project, a review of short-term rental regulations, and discussions about funding allocations for housing and construction projects in collaboration with the Community Development Authority (CDA). The council also explored waste management improvements, legislative priorities, and upcoming city celebrations.
- MN
- Mcleod County
- 12/8/25
- 12/09/2025
- 47 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent Glencoe-Silver Lake School Board meeting, the board tackled financial matters, particularly revolving around tax levies and their implications for future school funding.
- MN
- Washington County
- 12/8/25
- 12/08/2025
- 123 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The St. Paul Park Planning Commission’s recent meeting centered around proposed amendments to the B2 zoning ordinance and the impacts of a new development south of town. Key discussions included how to regulate assembly uses within commercial districts and the implications of potential traffic increases on local infrastructure. The commission also addressed procedural adjustments to streamline the planning and approval processes for future developments.
- MN
- Steele County
- 12/8/25
- 12/09/2025
- 53 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting, the Owatonna School Board received a clean audit report for the district’s financial statements. The board also addressed enrollment trends, fund balances, and ongoing challenges with special education funding.
- MN
- Morrison County
- 12/8/25
- 12/08/2025
- 99 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During the recent Little Falls School Board meeting, a parent raised concerns about their son’s exclusion from extracurricular activities due to a newly implemented district policy. The parent argued that the exclusion contradicted the student’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) and violated both state and federal disability laws. They have filed complaints with the Minnesota Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, alleging that the district failed to provide a non-discriminatory rationale for their decision. The parent’s detailed account highlighted discrepancies between the special education director and the special education coordinator’s interpretations of the district’s obligations under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and Section 504. The parent called for the district to address these misunderstandings and ensure compliance with laws protecting students with disabilities.