A work session with the Cranbury Volunteer Fire Company revealed that the township has been contemplating the formation of a fire district since 2014, driven by declining volunteer numbers and financial sustainability concerns. Chief Smith introduced the session, emphasizing the importance of public understanding and participation in the process. The volunteer fire company faces challenges with recruitment, particularly during daytime emergencies, described as unpredictable by participants. Currently, the fire company operates with around 20 volunteers, but only about 12 respond consistently to calls.

The feasibility of different fire service models was analyzed, including shared services and mutual aid agreements with neighboring towns. Participants expressed skepticism about the viability of these partnerships due to similar challenges faced by surrounding municipalities in recruiting and retaining volunteers. The conversation highlighted the financial constraints and operational dynamics involved, with an average operational cost estimated at $400,000. The township must address these financial questions to proceed with the fire district application process.

The projected tax increase for residents was a concern, with an estimated $450 increase per household annually to ensure reliable daytime fire coverage. This proposal aims to maintain and upgrade equipment, with examples such as a pumper truck costing $1.25 million and a tower truck between $2 million and $3 million. The proposal includes establishing a board of five elected fire commissioners accountable to taxpayers, providing more community control over the budget.

Concerns were raised about the proposal’s viability, given historical experiences with similar initiatives. The last fire district proposal was denied by the local finance board in 2014, casting doubt on the current plan’s approval chances. Suggesting mock tax bills could help residents understand the impact on their tax bills, participants emphasized the need for effective community engagement.

The discussion also addressed past financial management and operational oversight issues, with references to inadequate Department of Community Affairs oversight. The fire company expressed frustration over the financial strain, relying heavily on past donations, which are becoming unsustainable. The township’s maximum funding does not cover all operational costs, leading the fire company to use savings and endowments. The conversation noted the necessity of timely financial reports to maintain transparency.

Concerns about the recruitment and retention of volunteer firefighters were prominent, with recent efforts to engage local high schools. However, historical challenges persist, as young recruits often leave for college and do not return. The fire company’s financial condition was scrutinized, emphasizing the need for a strategic approach to ensure sustainability. The proposed governance structure of the fire district would allow any eligible Cranbury resident to run for commissioner, stressing the importance of candidates with finance and fire service experience.

Public comments featured input from community members on various topics, including the need to attract new volunteers and ensure reliable daytime coverage. Rising real estate prices were noted as a factor in the urgency of timely fire response to protect property safety and value. The committee acknowledged the importance of addressing public concerns and clarifying future communications regarding budgetary impacts on taxpayers.