0:00One of the primary topics was the salary and associated benefits for Mr. Flowers. The commission discussed a salary of $110,000, which falls within the advertised range of $94,000 to $110,000 for the city manager position. Additional benefits included family health insurance coverage, a city vehicle or a $750 monthly car allowance, and a one-time moving stipend of $4,000. The discussion was marked by concerns about the financial implications of these terms, especially given that the city’s previous city manager had a salary of $100,000 at the end of their tenure.

2:00:34The debate on insurance coverage revealed financial considerations. The city typically provides individual health insurance, requiring employees to cover family costs. The proposal for Mr. Flowers included family coverage, estimated to add between $29,000 and $40,000 annually to the city’s expenses. The commission considered splitting these costs, with the city covering a portion, while noting that Mr. Flowers’ acceptance of the position hinged on this benefit.

1:35:08Further complicating negotiations was the interpretation of termination provisions within the city manager’s contract. The city charter stipulates a contract allowing for termination with at least 60 days’ notice or 60 days’ severance pay. However, there were differing views on whether these terms were minimal requirements or caps. Commissioners discussed various precedents and interpretations, eventually agreeing on a motion that viewed these as minimum requirements.

54:46The commission also debated vacation time, initially proposing an upfront bank of 20 days of leave, differing from the current accrual system. The car allowance was particularly contentious, with Mr. Flowers emphasizing the necessity of a vehicle for his duties. The city’s previous practice had not included a vehicle provision, prompting discussions on whether the allowance was justified given the city’s size and budget constraints.

2:24:33The commission’s concerns extended to the overall financial health of Crescent City. One commissioner stressed the importance of knowing the city’s fund balance before finalizing the contract. Comparisons to other municipalities, such as Madison, Florida, highlighted Crescent City’s budgetary limitations, with Madison’s revenues exceeding Crescent City’s.

In addition to the employment terms, the meeting briefly addressed other city matters. The commission discussed scheduling a presentation by the Blue Ribbon Commission, tentatively set for February 25, and acknowledged updates expected from Captain ESS regarding a local boating issue.