The meeting’s most contentious topic was the ongoing deliberation regarding the town’s tax classification. The board analyzed the implications of shifting tax burdens between residential and commercial properties, with a focus on maintaining a balanced approach that considers the town’s growth and fiscal responsibilities. The chief assessor presented data revealing an increase in residential property values, which now accounted for over 79% of the total value, while commercial properties made up just over 15%. This shift prompted discussions on the appropriate residential factor and tax rate, with various proposals on the table, including maintaining a single tax rate for all property classes or adopting a factor that shifts some burden from residential to commercial properties.

Board members debated proposals such as an open space discount, residential exemption, and small commercial exemption, ultimately deciding against these measures. The primary concern was ensuring fair distribution without disproportionately affecting any group. One proposal suggested a tax rate factor of approximately 1.5140, which would result in a 2% increase for single-family homes, slightly more for condominiums, and about 4.76% for two-family properties.

As the board navigated these complex tax issues, they simultaneously explored the possibility of establishing a recall provision for elected officials. The discussion centered on a draft warrant article that would allow voters to initiate a recall under specific conditions, such as dissatisfaction with an official’s votes. This proposal has seen a mixed reception in past town meetings, and board members debated whether to advance it as a select board warrant.

Proponents of the recall provision argued for a more lenient approach, allowing recalls for any reason, to empower voters and hold officials accountable. Opponents cautioned against recalls for voting decisions, fearing it could undermine officials’ ability to make tough but necessary choices. The board considered procedural elements, such as the number of signatures required to certify a petition and the timeline for initiating a recall. There was consensus on the need for clarity and legal guidance to ensure the proposal’s adherence to legislative requirements.

In addition to these discussions, the meeting addressed various community matters. The board recognized graduates of the sixth Citizens Academy, emphasizing the importance of engaging residents in local government operations. Updates were provided on the Swamp Walk Restoration Project, with a funding goal of $15,000 and active collaboration between Danvers and Wenham. A $500 donation had already been received, and residents were informed about donation channels established at Town Hall.

The town manager shared insights from the International City Managers Association conference, highlighting sessions on community engagement and succession planning.

Lastly, the board addressed upcoming events, including the annual Christmas tree lighting and Veterans Day ceremonies, underscoring community involvement and honoring local veterans. Discussions on procedural matters, such as liquor license renewals and the use of electronic clickers in town meetings, were also noted.