The most contentious discussion centered on the proposal for 9 MacArthur Boulevard, where the applicants sought permission to transform a two-family structure into a three-family dwelling. The representatives for the project presented modifications to address previous concerns raised by the board and the community, particularly focusing on parking arrangements. The revised plans included the removal of one originally proposed parking space in front of the house and the addition of three conforming spaces at the rear, totaling six parking spaces. This configuration aimed to comply with safety standards and enhance the property’s appearance.

Despite the adjustments, board members expressed concerns about the potential impact of increased density on the neighborhood. The applicants argued that the project would not substantially alter the neighborhood’s character or overburden public services, emphasizing that the proposed changes would improve safety and organization of parking. They also highlighted the use of permeable materials for the new driveway to minimize environmental impact.

Public comments played a role in the proceedings, with a neighbor expressing support for the project and commending the homeowners for adhering to regulatory processes. The board’s deliberation culminated in a vote, with some members expressing reservations about the front parking configuration. Ultimately, the board approved the special permit, conditional on maintaining the building’s current exterior appearance and a $28,000 contribution to the affordable housing trust prior to occupancy.

In another significant case, the board addressed compliance issues on Andover Street, where the owner, Guy Castanza, sought to expand a non-conforming use of the property. Castanza reported progress in cleaning the site, including removing debris and unregistered vehicles. However, the board expressed frustration with the slow pace of compliance, emphasizing the need for a plot and parking plan by the November 10 meeting. The ongoing presence of unauthorized tree trucks and other equipment on the property was also raised as a concern.

The board granted a continuance for Castanza’s case, outlining a strict timeline for submitting the required plans and underscoring the importance of adhering to this schedule due to previous delays. Public comments further highlighted issues with the property’s current state and its impact on the surrounding area.

The meeting also included a review of a variance request for a new hotel on Enderot Street, seeking approval for a third building-mounted sign. The hotel’s representatives argued the necessity of the additional signage for visibility and wayfinding, given the site’s layout and branding requirements. The board engaged in a discussion about the proposed signs’ sizes and locations, weighing the branding needs against zoning regulations. Following a vote, the variance was granted, acknowledging the unique circumstances of the hotel’s location and branding needs.

Lastly, the board considered a request from Daniel and Hillary Gordon for a side setback encroachment on Sherwood Avenue. The proposed addition aimed to create a playroom for their expanding family. The board approved the request, noting that it would not affect the neighborhood’s character and acknowledging that neighbors had no objections.