A significant portion of the meeting delved into the complexities surrounding the storage containers proposed for the site. Nancy McCann, representing MJS Property Group LLC, outlined plans to demolish an existing non-conforming structure and construct a new building tailored to the business needs of the contractor’s yard. The request involved placing three storage containers on the property temporarily, two of which would encroach upon the setback, necessitating a variance.

The conversation highlighted the challenges posed by the site’s irregular shape and zoning requirements, which limited options for expansion. The board discussed the contradiction within the bylaws regarding storage containers, with one section allowing two by right, while another implied a special permit was required for more than two. This discrepancy led the project’s attorney to apply for both a variance and a special permit. Board members expressed concern over the potential for the variance to become a permanent fixture with the property, underlining the need for a temporary condition to prevent long-term complications.

Safety concerns, particularly regarding approximately 30 fuel containers on site, were a focal point. The board emphasized the importance of rectifying the unregistered fuel storage issue within 30 days, mandating an inspection by the fire department to ensure compliance. This condition was agreed upon by the applicants as necessary to align with safety standards and zoning regulations.

In addressing the broader implications of the variance, the board debated the potential precedent that could be set by approving such requests. A consensus emerged around the necessity of evaluating each case individually to avoid inadvertently relaxing standards for storage containers across the town.

The board also explored the timeline for the construction project, with the applicant indicating that securing a building permit could take three to four months. It was emphasized that if construction concluded sooner, the storage containers would need to be removed immediately.

Further discussion centered on the site’s stormwater management plans. A board member inquired about changes necessitated by the transition from a residential to a commercial structure, triggering new stormwater permit requirements due to land disturbance. The project engineer confirmed that approved drainage systems would be updated to accommodate the new building design.

The meeting also addressed the aesthetic and organizational improvements anticipated from the proposed development. The new building was designed to fit within the zoning requirements, promising a more efficient and visually appealing site. The applicant’s representative highlighted the intention to enhance compliance with zoning bylaws, addressing past issues related to non-compliant structures and activities on the site.

As the meeting concluded, the board moved to finalize the conditions attached to the variance and special permit. The variance would allow for two storage containers in the setback until the completion of the new structure, with the final written decision documenting the hardship related to the property’s shape. The special permit included conditions for a fire inspection and a one-year check-in to ensure ongoing compliance.