The most urgent topic was presented by Joel W. Lansky, also known as Turtle Joe, who reported a sharp decline in sea turtle nests on St. Pete Beach. Lansky highlighted that only 27 nests were identified this year compared to 70 the previous year. He attributed this decline to recent beach renourishment efforts, which have resulted in a flat beach profile, inhibiting suitable nesting conditions for sea turtles. Lansky explained that the northern section of the beach now features a flat surface, making nests vulnerable to high tides. He criticized the renourishment strategy, pointing out that it created artificial “mountains” rather than natural dunes, deterring turtles from nesting due to the steep inclines.

Lansky’s observations sparked a broader conversation about the renourishment design and its implications for the local wildlife. He emphasized that the height of the constructed dunes was a significant barrier for turtles, which prefer more gradual slopes for nesting. The discussion also touched on other environmental impacts, such as the role of beach furniture in obstructing turtle nesting areas. Lansky noted that lawn chairs south of the Don CeSar hotel form a “wall,” further complicating the nesting process.

Committee members engaged with Lansky’s concerns, discussing the need for better dune management practices and the importance of preserving the natural beach profile. They deliberated on the city’s ordinance allowing for 50% non-native plants in landscaping, questioning the consistency of permitting invasive species classified as outlawed. This highlighted the challenges of balancing private property rights with ecological health, emphasizing the need for collaborative efforts between community groups and the city.

Another presentation was given by Nancy Stevens of the Dun Savers of St. Pete Beach. Stevens detailed the group’s volunteer efforts in removing invasive and non-native plants from the dunes, logging over 670 volunteer hours since January. She identified problematic species such as African fountain grass and asparagus fern. Stevens extended an invitation to the community for an upcoming sea oat planting event.

The meeting also delved into the legal complexities surrounding customary beach use and property rights. Discussions referenced a notable case involving St. Pete Beach and Readington Beach, where ordinances on beach access led to lawsuits and legal battles. The committee reflected on the implications of a recent ruling in favor of Readington Beach, which could set precedents for similar cases in the state. This legal framework draws parallels to the doctrine of prescriptive easement, where long-standing use can establish rights.

Committee members debated the need for updated ordinances to address current issues, particularly in light of complaints about public behavior on the beach. One participant noted that complaints had been raised about “boorish and loudish behavior” and public urination, emphasizing the importance of the committee being informed about such issues.

The topic of beach lighting also emerged as a point of concern. The committee anticipated a turtle lighting audit, conducted by the county in collaboration with sea turtle trackers, with local code enforcement handling compliance. Members stressed the importance of this audit for future discussions, as proper lighting is important for minimizing disruptions to nesting turtles.

The meeting concluded with discussions on procedural matters, such as the process of adding agenda items and the management of beach ordinances. Members expressed varying views on the need for flexibility versus a structured approach to agenda setting, highlighting the complexities of managing a public committee. The need for clear communication and effective governance was a recurring theme.