Deerfield MVP Group Advocates for Flood Management Program, Urges Select Board Action

At the recent Deerfield Select Board meeting, the Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness (MVP) Core Group focused on addressing flood risks in the downtown area, culminating in a recommendation for the Select Board to write to the state conservationist to join the PL 566 flood management program. This program aims to mitigate flood impacts through various community and environmental strategies.

The MVP Core Group began by establishing the consensus that the downtown area faces a genuine risk of flooding. Members highlighted that historical and current observations support the existence of this risk, with climate change contributing to more frequent and intense weather events. They agreed that potential solutions could mitigate the effects of common storms, although extreme events, like 100-year floods, might remain challenging to manage.

The group also determined there is significant interest from the town and other stakeholders in addressing these flood risks.

In a move, the MVP Core Group voted to recommend that the Select Board draft a letter to Dan Wright, the state conservationist, to participate in the PL 566 program. This initiative would enable Deerfield to work with multiple stakeholders, including farmers and homeowners, to implement flood risk mitigation strategies.

Moreover, the meeting addressed the necessity of a bundled Notice of Intent (NOI) to allow for maintenance work in flood-prone areas. The group discussed the importance of identifying funding streams for this purpose, emphasizing the need to proceed with modifications to the existing bundled NOI. This would facilitate legal maintenance activities, potentially incorporating additional areas of concern as they emerge.

The meeting also touched upon the opportunity for local water districts to become stakeholders in the flood management process, potentially utilizing water from artisanal springs for reservoir development. The flexibility of the PL 566 program to include various stakeholders was seen as a significant advantage.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: