Deerfield Select Board Opposes Pipeline Projects, Emphasizes Public Health and Budget Challenges

The Deerfield Select Board meeting on March 26, 2025, tackled issues including opposition to gas pipeline projects, discussions around the public health nurse’s role and hours, and financial decisions impacting the town’s health and inspection services. Adjustmentsttention was given to environmental concerns, with the board agreeing to co-sign a letter opposing the expansion of gas pipelines, and to budgetary matters affecting local public health services.

09:16A primary focus of the meeting was the opposition to gas pipeline projects in New England. The board discussed a letter addressed to the governors of nine states, urging them to prioritize renewable energy over fossil fuel infrastructure. This letter, supported by a group of citizens, highlighted the environmental risks and economic disadvantages associated with such pipeline projects. A representative from Clarkdale Fruit Farms, a local business potentially impacted by past pipeline proposals, testified against the construction, citing potential threats to agricultural land and natural resources. Carolyn, a member of the Select Board, echoed these concerns, recalling the disruption caused by the Kinder Morgan pipeline proposal in 2015. She emphasized that the gas from these pipelines was largely for export, not local use, and would increase costs for ratepayers. Carolyn advocated for a shift towards renewable energy and urged the board to support the letter and revive a municipal coalition to combat these projects. In a show of support, the board moved to endorse the letter and agreed to coordinate with community members for further action.

18:18The board also addressed the intricate issue of the public health nurse’s role, specifically the working hours and responsibilities of Cindy, the nurse in question. Notably, Cindy had been working approximately 18 hours a week, exceeding the officially budgeted 12 hours. This discrepancy raised concerns about liability during her additional hours and highlighted the need for clarity in her role. Cindy was described as vital to the well-being of Deerfield’s seniors, providing essential services through home visits and community outreach. The board acknowledged the importance of her work, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, and discussed the potential imbalance in resource allocation with nearby towns. The board proposed a budget allowing Cindy to work 15 hours on Deerfield-related tasks and an additional three hours on NA Grant work, totaling 18 hours. They underscored the need for clear communication between Cindy and Ned, her supervisor, to better address her needs and support the community effectively. Concerns about Cindy purchasing supplies out of pocket were noted, with a limited budget of $500 for supplies prompting discussion on additional resource requirements.

32:28The impending retirement of the animal inspector brought forward discussions on the role and the $2,000 stipend associated with it. The board considered reallocating these duties to the health agent, emphasizing the need to evaluate the workload and compensation. Monitoring residential farm animals, such as backyard chickens, was discussed in light of avian flu concerns. The board considered utilizing dog licensing notices for community outreach regarding animal registration. The current health agent’s unique qualifications were acknowledged, but concerns were raised about the implications of adding responsibilities without proper compensation.

51:52Further, the board reviewed upcoming town meeting articles, including the closure of the warrant for the meeting scheduled for April 28. Key articles included budget adjustments, capital stabilization fund proposals, and decarbonization initiatives. Notable discussions involved Article 97 land easements required for bridge footings, with compensation estimated at $20,500. The board also discussed transitioning the Town Constable position from elected to appointed and addressed tax title reforms to align with a recent Supreme Court decision. Decarbonization initiatives introduced a specialized energy code bylaw and proposals for zero-emission vehicle policies, all aimed at establishing Deerfield as a climate leader community.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: