The meeting also delved into the possibility of modernizing utility payment methods, with discussions focusing on the financial implications of maintaining multiple staff for in-person payments amid a growing shift towards online and kiosk-based transactions. A council member highlighted the need for a data-driven evaluation to determine the volume of in-person payments. A potential transition to more automated methods was debated, with suggestions to consider the cost-effectiveness of such changes in the next fiscal year.

A significant part of the discussion involved the examination of transaction fees associated with online payments, currently set at six dollars per transaction. The council expressed concern over the impact of these fees on resident adoption of online payment options, with some members advocating for an investigation into alternative providers that might offer more competitive rates. The idea of absorbing transaction fees as a way to enhance service accessibility was also floated, with the intention of reducing financial barriers for residents.

In addition to utility billing, the council addressed infrastructure needs, particularly concerning the city’s sewer system. Plans to replace the aging lift station one force main, estimated at $150,000, were discussed as part of broader efforts to improve the city’s water and sewer infrastructure. The council acknowledged the necessity of addressing issues identified in a previous inflow and infiltration (INI) report, which focused on manhole linings and cleanout repairs to enhance system capacity and reliability.

The meeting also highlighted long-term financial considerations, including the exploration of grant funding and its role in supporting infrastructure projects. Council members discussed the importance of ensuring transparent and effective allocation of capacity fees within the budget, emphasizing the need to safeguard the city’s financial standing amidst ongoing budgetary constraints.

Concerns about the city’s debt obligations were raised, with discussions focusing on the maturity of bonds associated with various water infrastructure improvements. The council acknowledged the long-term nature of these debts and the necessity of understanding the specific projects funded by these bonds. This financial scrutiny extended to discussions about potential revenue sources from dump fees, with the city exploring the feasibility of establishing a waste receiving station to generate additional income.

Another focal point of the meeting was the management of the city’s budget, particularly in light of potential employee bonuses and raises. The council weighed the financial implications of granting one-time bonuses versus implementing cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs), highlighting the need for careful financial planning to ensure sustainable compensation strategies. The impact of budgetary decisions on employee retention was a recurring theme, with council members expressing differing views on prioritizing employee welfare against the backdrop of infrastructure needs.

In addition, the council deliberated on the importance of strategic planning for future infrastructure improvements, particularly regarding the airport and its potential role in economic growth. Discussions underscored the importance of balancing short-term financial challenges with long-term investment in infrastructure to support revenue generation and job creation.