One part of the meeting was the discussion concerning the redevelopment of 401 Creek Road. A resident named Joseph raised concerns about the redevelopment approval process, specifically highlighting the lack of adequate notification to residents about changes impacting the zoning characteristics. Joseph pointed out that nearly 70 senior residents had previously attended a meeting to oppose the redevelopment. He questioned the notification procedure, particularly whether notices had been sent to adjoining property owners as required by statute. A committee member clarified that redevelopment follows a different legal framework than traditional zoning changes, which does not mandate individual notices for adjacent properties. Despite this explanation, residents remained skeptical about the decision-making process and its transparency.

The council acknowledged these apprehensions and revealed that they had informally directed the solicitor to engage with the developer to explore the possibility of purchasing the property, which had financial implications due to its original $2 million purchase price. Residents’ skepticism about the redevelopment’s economic viability was echoed by another community member, who suggested that the project might not represent the highest and best use of the property. The council invited further dialogue on this matter.

In parallel, discussions about cannabis regulations drew attention. The council considered the introduction of cannabis-related businesses, focusing on Class 2 manufacturing and Class 4 distribution facilities. There was debate over the appropriate distance these facilities should maintain from residential areas, with a proposal to keep them at least 250 feet away from homes, parks, and schools. Concerns about increased traffic, particularly from potential seven-day operations due to storage limitations, were raised. Some members expressed personal opposition to these facilities, citing potential negative impacts on traffic and neighborhoods.

The financial implications of cannabis operations were also discussed. While it was noted that towns with retail cannabis operations have seen substantial tax revenue, there was skepticism about whether these financial benefits would outweigh potential community challenges. The council considered the regulatory landscape and acknowledged the importance of ensuring that any cannabis operations would comply with state laws. Public comments revealed mixed feelings, with some residents questioning whether the tax gains would justify the broader implications of introducing cannabis businesses into Delanco.

Beyond these major topics, the meeting touched on other community and municipal issues. There was a report on ongoing municipal projects, such as the completion of the seawall project and the 2024 road program, which includes surveys and designs for upcoming construction. Additionally, the council discussed a recent incident involving the local fire department, where a lithium-ion battery explosion emphasized the need for public safety awareness regarding electronic devices.

The council also addressed routine municipal affairs, including the certification of the 2023 fiscal year audit, which contained no recommendations or comments. Upcoming community events were announced, such as Community Day at the Delanco Firehouse, a flu shot clinic, and a 5K run hosted by the Delanco Women’s Civic Club.