During the meeting, community members voiced concerns about the transparency and timing of the merger information, with some feeling that details should have been shared sooner. The board president and Superintendent Leonard Fitts responded to these concerns, explaining that the timing was influenced by discussions with the County Superintendent and that careful planning was essential before making details public.

The financial situation was a focal point, with Superintendent Fitts emphasizing the district’s need for immediate action to mitigate the deficit. Debates arose about the potential school closure’s impact, with attendees expressing concern over the educational outcomes for students if different grade levels were merged. Questions were also raised about the low ranking of the district in the state and the need for educational improvements.

The proposed transition for Walnut Street and Pearson Elementary Schools was outlined in a presentation that described a “school within a school” model. This reorganization aimed to control student movement, enhance academic opportunities, and address safety and parking issues. The plan also included providing services for children with special needs and improving test scores via better academic instruction.

The budget presentation revealed past deficits and the reliance on surplus funds for the upcoming school year’s proposed budget, which included a 2% tax increase. The board discussed the implications of using surplus funds on future budgets, emphasizing the need for sustainable financial solutions.

A significant drop in federal and state grants was highlighted, with the district’s grant revenue decreasing from over $600,000 two years ago to $246,000. Despite this challenge, the district managed to save on special education expenses by bringing the child study team in-house. The budget breakdown also accounted for over $4 million in staff salaries, tuition expenses, insurance costs, therapists’ purchase services, student transportation, and employee benefits.

Special education was another major topic, as board members inquired about the effect of proposed changes on students, specifically regarding the potential separation of middle and junior high students and the number of children in special education classes. The board sought to ensure that the changes would not adversely affect the cost per pupil and the gym’s utilization by elementary students.

Public comments extended to various aspects of the proposed changes, with individuals expressing skepticism about the projected savings from the merger and concerns about the impact on students and staff. The public also called for increased funding and support for special education students, with one community member providing an emotional plea for more sensitivity and backing for these children and their families.

The meeting concluded with a decision to approve the school transition and the 2024-2025 budget. In addition, plans were discussed to implement a Naval STEM program for enrichment and address concerns raised during the meeting.

Throughout the session, there was also mention of the district’s ongoing efforts to secure grant funding for educational initiatives, the importance of accurate financial numbers, and the potential impact of affordable housing developments on the district. The board also discussed potential changes to extracurricular activities, bell schedules, and the use of existing space for performances, considering alternative venues such as local churches and neighboring school facilities.