The discussion on the turf field’s drainage issues took center stage during the meeting, spurred by a detailed presentation from Halen Aldridge, a third-party vendor. The report revealed that the grain size of the base and finishing stone materials did not meet contract specifications, adversely impacting the field’s drainage capability. Questions arose about the methodologies of various companies that conducted the grain size and infiltration tests, with discrepancies found in the drainage rates measured. A focus on testing saturated soil was emphasized for obtaining accurate results, as current issues have resulted in water moving horizontally across the field, creating puddling.

Further examination of the field’s materials, including the rubberized synthetic HDP backing and shock pad, underscored the necessity for permeable elements to ensure proper vertical drainage. The committee and attendees engaged in a thorough inquiry into the technical aspects of the field testing, seeking to grasp the full scope of the drainage problem and its potential resolutions. The discussion pointed to the need for data-driven analysis to address the inadequate drainage and ensure that the community receives the quality it was promised in the project.

In addition to the field drainage concerns, the superintendent presented a report summarizing his eight months of work within the district, focusing on enrollment increases, demographic changes, and the response to a $2 million budget reduction. The report identified the district’s strengths, including a strong community pride and the continuity of being a “dolphin” from pre-K to 12th grade. It also highlighted the well-attended school-based traditions and district-wide events that are integral to the schools’ identities.

However, the superintendent also pointed out areas needing improvement, such as inconsistent staffing models, financial challenges, and demographic shifts. The district’s academic achievement data showing performance below state proficiency levels in math and ELA prompted discussions about the perceived challenge of courses and the implementation of schoolwide policies. The superintendent emphasized the need for strategic planning to ensure equitable outcomes for students.

The committee’s decision to continue accepting school choice students for the upcoming school year was met with consensus. The meeting also covered the Student Opportunity Act, with plans to implement a K-2 mathematics program and extend the school day across all grades. The discussion on this topic revolved around the need to communicate the district’s positive attributes more effectively and to leverage strengths to prioritize student achievement.

In terms of community engagement and support, the committee noted the positive response from the select boards and finance committees of both towns for the proposed school budget. However, the necessity of an $880,000 voter override was acknowledged, as its failure to pass would result in a net reduction of $1.2 million and consequential significant cuts.