A central issue discussed was the allocation of dock slips at two properties owned by Mr. Perry. The council was tasked with determining whether the proposed use of these slips adhered to prior agreements, which aimed to provide public access. The properties, interconnected by a boardwalk, were intended to offer nearly 21 public slips, a significant increase from the initially available nine. The council sought to uphold the public benefit by ensuring these slips remained accessible in accordance with the 2019 approval, which underscored public access as a key condition. The discussion revealed a lack of clarity in the definitions of “public transient mooring slips” within the city’s land development code, contributing to ongoing disputes over slip usage and management.

Public comments further complicated the issue, with residents voicing concerns over the potential loss of public access. Some argued that the developer was attempting to restrict access contrary to previous commitments. Others emphasized the importance of maintaining public access for economic and recreational purposes, fearing that any reduction in available slips could detrimentally impact the local economy and community enjoyment of the harbor.

The proposal included a plan to clarify slip usage without expanding the number of slips, emphasizing short-term public docking for activities like fueling and dining. However, the ambiguity surrounding definitions and the absence of a formal agreement detailing the conditions of use led to significant friction among council members.

Ultimately, the council decided not to support the current development order application, citing the need for further clarification and alignment with previous public benefit commitments. This decision underscored the complex interplay between private property rights and public access, highlighting the council’s role in safeguarding community interests against potential encroachments by private developments.

Beyond the dock slip debate, the meeting also addressed other topics, including public safety concerns related to ebikes and low-speed vehicles (LSVs). Public works safety committee representatives outlined the need for updated ordinances to manage the increasing use of high-speed ebikes on sidewalks, which has posed safety risks. Flyers distributed to raise awareness reportedly reduced incidents, but enforcement challenges remain. The council discussed the importance of legislative clarity and community involvement in addressing these safety concerns.

Another notable issue was the public outcry over helicopter activity in Marino Acres, raised by resident Joanne Balon. Balon called for the establishment of a committee or town hall meeting involving the FAA, NTSB, tour operators, and city representatives to mitigate the disruption caused by frequent helicopter flights over residential areas. Though the city lacks control over airspace, the council acknowledged its responsibility to address resident safety concerns and explore collaborative solutions.

In addition to these discussions, the council considered the implementation of a new health reimbursement arrangement using a “difference card” program to assist city employees with healthcare expenses. This initiative aims to reduce out-of-pocket costs and mitigate rising insurance premiums, with projected savings of approximately $2.3 million over five years. Council members expressed support for the program, emphasizing the need for thorough communication to ensure a smooth transition for employees.

The meeting also touched on various infrastructure projects, including the awarding of a $2.383 million contract to H&T Contractors for a construction project, slightly below the engineer’s estimate. The timeline for this project was set to be discussed at a subsequent meeting. Additionally, the council approved an interlocal agreement with Okaloosa County to fund a $4 million grant application for an underpass at the Stallman intersection.