The primary topic of discussion revolved around the controversial multifamily housing project, which includes a proposed five-story apartment building. Residents voiced strong objections, citing worries about increased traffic, noise, and the overall disruption to the neighborhood’s character. A particular concern was raised about the project’s scale, as the building would increase the population density in the area. Residents highlighted the limited access via Shore Drive and insisted that such a development would inevitably lead to traffic congestion.

One resident argued against the feasibility of the proposed $2,000 rent, questioning the affordability and appeal of living near the lake with no direct access. The sentiment that property values might decline was echoed by others, with one resident expressing fear of being forced to relocate due to the development’s impact on the neighborhood’s quality of life.

In response to these concerns, a representative of the developer attempted to reassure the community, emphasizing the quality and long-term investment planned for the area. The developer highlighted the inclusion of high-end features like underground parking and landscaped areas, intended to enhance rather than detract from the community.

Council members were divided on the issue, with some advocating for the project’s potential to alleviate the urgent housing shortage in the community. They cited reports indicating a lack of available rentals in Detroit Lakes. However, others expressed skepticism about the adequacy of the information available, calling for detailed site plans and more comprehensive community engagement before making irreversible decisions.

The debate extended to the zoning classifications, with discussions about potentially changing the zoning from RM (Residential Multifamily) to RA (Residential Agricultural) until a detailed development plan could be presented. Some council members emphasized the importance of balancing city growth with existing residents’ concerns, while others stressed the need for transparency and community involvement in the planning process.

A proposal for a housing study commissioned by the Housing Authority and the city was also referenced. This approach was supported by some council members, who emphasized the importance of data-driven decision-making to ensure community interests were safeguarded.

Despite the debate, the council proceeded to a roll call vote, resulting in a narrow approval of the motion, with a tally of five in favor and three against. Following the decision, the council encouraged further dialogue between the developer and residents to explore alternative locations for the proposed development.

In addition to the multifamily development discussion, the council addressed several other significant items. A public hearing was held on Ordinance 25, proposing a temporary prohibition on cannabis business operations in Detroit Lakes. The council granted the first reading of the ordinance after city staff explained the need for a moratorium, given the state’s expedited process for social equity applicants.

The council also approved the establishment of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District 43-1 for a new Kubota dealership on Highway 10 East, expected to create 7 to 12 jobs and involve a $4 million investment. Michaela from Baker Tilly presented an overview of TIF as a tool for redevelopment, emphasizing its ability to stimulate projects that wouldn’t occur without public assistance.

Additionally, the council approved a variance for an addition to a home on Eastshore Drive, allowing for less than a 75-foot setback and increased impervious surface coverage. This variance had received unanimous support from both the Community Development Committee and the Planning Commission.

The meeting also touched on several infrastructure projects, including updates on street rehabilitations and a new water tower project. The council discussed funding for new hangars at the airport, authorizing the issuance of $1.3 million in municipal bonds.

Lastly, the council addressed concerns regarding parking during the upcoming fair and approved a sponsorship request for the October Fest event. The session concluded with an acknowledgment of public safety efforts during recent celebrations and a reminder of upcoming budget meetings, highlighting the ongoing financial planning for Detroit Lakes.