One notable issue was the proposed increase in trash bag prices as part of the town’s pay-as-you-throw program. The Solid Waste Committee recommended raising the cost of large trash bags from $20 to $28 per roll and small bags from $10 to $15. This proposal sparked conversations about the financial implications for the town and its residents. The committee’s decision to increase prices was driven by the need to cover rising operational costs, though it was acknowledged that even the proposed hikes wouldn’t fully bridge the gap between expenses and revenue.

Concerns were voiced about the environmental impact of the current trash bag system, with some participants arguing that it contributes to increased plastic waste in landfills. They contended that the price hike could deter residents from purchasing the bags, potentially leading to a greater reliance on more costly dumpster services. Suggestions were made to send a letter to residents clarifying the reasons behind the price adjustments and detailing the financial realities of the waste disposal program. One person emphasized the importance of transparency by stating, “show them the costs, show them what the increase was,” underscoring the need for clear communication to ensure public understanding.

The meeting also covered the hiring of a health agent, a vital role within the community. The board expressed a consensus on the importance of securing a qualified candidate who would be dedicated to the town. It was noted that the Northern Bristol County Public Health Alliance is in the process of hiring a health agent to serve multiple towns, including Dighton. This collaborative approach was seen as beneficial, providing the town access to a professional without incurring additional costs. The board discussed the competitive compensation for the position and expressed their intent to attract a candidate capable of making contributions and staying with the town long-term.

Amidst these discussions, the board addressed ongoing health concerns, such as vermin infestations in the community. There was a dialogue on the appropriate handling of complaints and the procedural gaps due to the absence of a health agent. Suggestions included using exterminators while being cautious of potential risks to wildlife from poisons. A participant shared their experience of canvassing the area to better understand the issue, comparing the vermin problem to a cancer affecting multiple households. The board emphasized the necessity of prompt communication regarding complaints to keep members informed and engaged.

Further discussions involved the status of a nursing program that has been operational for about a year and a half. Positive feedback was reported, and the identification of a new nurse was noted, with her start date set for January. The board considered setting up an emergency meeting to present recommendations to the Selectmen about the new nursing candidate, as their upcoming meeting was reportedly booked.

Additionally, there was a decision to reenact a barn and stable permit system, increasing fees from $10 to $25, excluding canines. This change aims to improve animal tracking for emergency preparedness, particularly for evacuation and disease control. However, the board decided to table discussions on combining barn and stable permits until the next meeting, awaiting further input from Animal Control.