The board is considering implementing a new trash collection system, which involves residents purchasing specific bags for waste disposal. Large bags, with a capacity of approximately 33 gallons, would cost $7 each, while smaller 15-gallon bags would be priced at $3.50. This change aims to create a fair pricing structure based on usage, encouraging residents to be more mindful of their waste generation. The average household in Dighton produces about 1,241 pounds of trash annually, leading to projections that each household would require approximately 50 large bags or 103 small bags per year. The anticipated revenue from these sales could substantially contribute to covering sanitation costs, potentially exceeding one million dollars by the fiscal year 2027.

Board members expressed a preference for this bag fee model over more traditional waste management methods, noting that it aligns with broader waste reduction strategies, including initiatives like recycling programs and backyard composting. Concerns were raised about the need for transparency in communicating these changes to residents, with one member emphasizing the importance of clear explanations to prevent potential backlash.

In addition to waste management discussions, the board tackled issues related to septic systems, particularly in relation to wetlands and environmental protection. Conversations highlighted the importance of early wetland identification in septic system applications to avoid complications later in the process. There was debate over the responsibilities of engineers versus local wetland scientists in determining wetland boundaries, with concerns that reliance on GIS mapping might lead to inaccuracies.

A specific case involving the proposed conversion of a garage into residential units behind a pizza store was discussed. The property’s existing septic system would need to be upgraded to accommodate the additional units. The health agent’s report suggested that the property owner should either reapply for a single unit or upgrade the system to manage the increased load. The dialogue encouraged the property owner to seek guidance from an engineer to ensure compliance with health and safety regulations.

The meeting also addressed ongoing issues with a resident’s septic system, where there were allegations of sewage overflow potentially impacting nearby wetlands. The board acknowledged previous lapses in communication between the health department and the Board of Selectmen, with calls for improved coordination to prevent similar issues in the future. One member expressed frustration over the lack of timely updates.

Further discussions touched on the potential system upgrade for the Board of Health to enhance communication and record-keeping. This upgrade would enable automated emails to residents regarding property tax inquiries, reducing the burden on office channels. Despite concerns about the cost, estimated at $6,000 for the initial license, the board recognized the potential benefits of improved inter-departmental communication.

A representative of the conservation committee urged prompt action on a property application, proposing an emergency meeting to address the situation effectively. The need for improved planning and collaboration among departments was emphasized to ensure efficient handling of such issues in the future.

As the meeting concluded, the board acknowledged the challenges in coordinating efforts across multiple departments, particularly concerning the health agent’s availability. Discussions highlighted the necessity of having someone available during the week to address matters. Despite acknowledging hiring challenges, there was a clear call for better weekday coverage to serve the town’s needs effectively.