The board engaged in a discussion on the town’s budget crisis, highlighting the anticipated deficit of approximately $269,000. They explored various strategies to address this shortfall, emphasizing a cautious approach to the use of free cash, which is generally reserved for one-time expenses. The allocation of this free cash was outlined, with specific amounts proposed for areas such as snow and ice management and the reserve fund. To tackle the deficit, the board considered options including implementing a per household user fee for trash services, revisiting a debt exclusion for capital obligations, executing a two-and-a-half override for operational needs, or formulating a service and personnel reduction plan.

In addition to these internal financial strategies, the board also discussed the implications of Chapter 70 funding, which traditionally supports public education. Concerns were raised about the funding formula, perceived as biased towards larger communities, placing smaller towns like Dighton at a disadvantage. The board emphasized the importance of advocating for additional funding from local legislators and exploring ways to enhance the town’s Career and Technical Education (CTE) program to secure more Chapter 74 funding, which offers greater financial support than Chapter 70.

The discussion about school funding dovetailed with an acknowledgment of the school department’s budget cuts, reducing the proposed increase from 4.1% to 3.78%. This adjustment was part of ongoing negotiations, with the school committee expressing openness to transferring surplus funds to the town, contingent on additional state funding. Public input during the meeting included reflections on the school budget hearing, where clarity was sought about financial obligations tied to special education services.

Another prominent topic was the town’s trash management costs, which had not seen price adjustments in several years despite increasing expenses. The board considered the practicality of introducing a user fee structure, potentially involving quarterly payments, and discussed the possibility of a senior citizen discount. The frequency of recycling services was also debated, with suggestions to revert to an alternate-week schedule to save costs. Concerns about compliance with state recycling mandates were raised, noting potential fines for non-compliance.

Further discussions addressed the efficiency of storing items in a rented shipping container, costing the town $200 per month. The board considered alternatives such as recycling or conducting auctions for surplus items, noting the minimal returns from previous auctions. The inefficacy of maintaining the current storage arrangement was emphasized, with a call for better planning and disposal strategies to mitigate costs.

The meeting also touched on the town’s solar projects, with updates provided on various installations and their progress. The importance of adhering to regulatory standards and establishing consistent pilot agreements for tax purposes was underscored to ensure smooth negotiations in the future.