Dighton Board of Selectmen Weighs Trash Bag Price Hike Amid Financial Concerns
- Meeting Overview:
In a special remote meeting on June 16, 2026, the Dighton Board of Selectmen addressed pressing financial challenges, focusing primarily on the need to increase trash bag fees to alleviate the town’s budget shortfall.
The most critical item on the agenda was the proposal to increase the price of trash bags. The board deliberated on the financial implications of this change, highlighting that the current fees were insufficient to cover operational costs. A proposed hike to $40 was mentioned, with financial analyses suggesting a more immediate need to raise fees to between $33 and $34 to break even. Concerns were raised about the community’s reaction to multiple price increases, with some board members suggesting a single price adjustment might be more palatable than multiple incremental hikes.
There was acknowledgment that if trash bags became too costly, residents might opt for alternative waste disposal methods, such as dumpsters, which could offer more economical solutions for larger households. This potential shift in waste management preferences prompted a discussion on the comparison between the cost of trash disposal through bags versus dumpsters for families generating more waste.
In addition to fee adjustments, the board explored alternative waste management service providers. Waste Zero, a company based in North Carolina, had submitted a proposal, but local options were also being considered. There was uncertainty about the best path forward, as some board members suggested delaying a decision to gather more quotes, while others felt pressured to respond to Waste Zero’s request for an answer. The board emphasized the importance of negotiating rates with Waste Zero, noting that even small price reductions could impact the town’s budget.
A creative suggestion emerged to eliminate unnecessary components from the trash bags, such as inserts and ties, to potentially lower costs. This idea initiated further discussion about the overall expenses associated with the trash bag service and the need for continued outreach to identify more competitive pricing.
Ultimately, the board decided to table the trash bag discussion until the next meeting, allowing time for further research and a more thorough analysis of the financial implications. This motion was seconded and passed.
Following the trash bag fee discussion, the board received updates on other community matters. The health agent reported on a kennel license application on Summer Street, raising concerns about cleanliness and potential health risks due to hoarding and inadequate safety measures at the residence. The situation involved numerous animals, including seven dogs and three cats, prompting plans for a follow-up inspection next month to reassess conditions.
Additionally, the board discussed stormwater management, emphasizing the need for town meeting approval for necessary measures. The importance of obtaining a vote from the community was highlighted, with the next town meeting scheduled for a few months later.
The farmers’ market update was also a point of interest, noting that 14 vendors were scheduled to participate. However, a food truck previously committed to attending withdrew due to a scheduling conflict with Father’s Day. The board explored options for finding a last-minute replacement to ensure adequate food options for attendees. It was agreed that food trucks holding annual permits should not incur additional charges for participating in the market, encouraging their involvement in community events.
New regulations for sand and septic installations were introduced, addressing repeated failures of Title Five systems in a development. Concerns about the quality of sand used and the type of septic system installed led to a proposal for mandatory third-party lab testing of sand for new installations. The board agreed on this approach, asserting that homeowners should not be responsible for substandard materials.
To enhance accountability, a proposal was made for engineers to certify that their as-built designs matched actual installations. This was prompted by a recent incident where a submitted as-built did not accurately reflect the installed system, potentially causing immediate failures. The board voted to combine the motions regarding sand testing and as-built certification into one streamlined process.
In the final discussions, the board addressed the recent grand opening of the Swap Shed, which saw community participation through item drop-offs. However, the need for additional volunteer assistance at future events was emphasized to ensure smooth operations.
Michael P. Mullen, Jr.
City Council Officials:
Peter D. Caron, Nicole Mello, Leonard E. Hull, Jr., Karin Brady (Executive Assistant/ HR Coordinator), Leeanne Kerwin (Administrative Assistant)
-
Meeting Type:
City Council
-
Committee:
-
Meeting Date:
06/16/2026
-
Recording Published:
06/17/2026
-
Duration:
32 Minutes
-
Notability Score:
Routine
Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:
-
State:
Massachusetts
-
County:
Bristol County
-
Towns:
Dighton
Recent Meetings Nearby:
- 06/24/2026
- 06/24/2026
- 26 Minutes
- 06/24/2026
- 06/24/2026
- 59 Minutes
- 06/24/2026
- 248 Minutes