A central topic of discussion was the potential removal of a dam near Elm Street. Concerns were raised about the implications for local property owners and the historical significance of the area. Engineers have tested the dam, with contamination found across Elm Street, not at the dam site itself. The process of dismantling the dam, if pursued, would necessitate extensive public hearings to address concerns from property owners and discuss easements. Beth Lambert, referred to as “the dam lady,” was mentioned as a key figure in the engineering assessments. Miscommunication at a recent selectmen’s meeting was clarified. The commission emphasized that any decisions regarding the dam’s future would be delayed, pending thorough liability assessments.

The meeting also tackled compliance issues with stormwater management regulations. It was noted that the town must align its practices with Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection standards. Concerns were voiced about potential discrepancies between the town’s bylaws and more EPA standards. The commission discussed involving the engineering firm Weston and Samson to provide oversight and ensure compliance with stormwater management requirements, particularly for projects like the Almea Ridge residential subdivision and a proposed storage facility on Elm Street. The applicant for the Almea Ridge project addressed concerns about incorrect soil type calculations for stormwater basins, attributing them to lab errors. Adjustments were made, but some commission members called for further verification to ensure compliance with local regulations. The necessity for confirmatory tests before construction was debated.

In another discussion, the commission considered establishing a revolving fund to support enforcement actions and conservation efforts. This fund would allow the commission to retain a portion of revenues from filing fees and fines, particularly for addressing violations. The initiative aims to ensure that residents who comply with conservation guidelines are not financially burdened by enforcement actions against violators. Further discussions are planned to refine the proposal and establish clear revenue streams and allocation percentages.

The commission also reviewed various development projects with potential environmental impacts. A proposal for a storage facility on Elm Street was discussed, with the applicant providing updates on stormwater drainage adjustments to comply with local regulations. The commission emphasized the importance of incorporating native plantings in buffer zones and ensuring that dumpsters are relocated to comply with wetland regulations. The proposal for a new studio and pool by Kevin and Alexander Messier within a wetland buffer zone was scrutinized, with conditions set to manage pool water disposal and ensure compliance with no-touch zones.

Additionally, the commission addressed enforcement actions for properties with noted violations, including 2371 County Street and Hart Street. The need for regular site inspections and coordination with property owners to rectify issues was emphasized. The commission also discussed a failed septic system on Milk Street, noting environmental risks due to its proximity to a sensitive area. Coordination with the Board of Health was proposed to ensure proper investigation and water quality testing.