The Elm Street project was a focal point of discussion, with commission members thoroughly debating the specifications and design of the proposed stormwater basin. The basin, designed as a constructed wetland, required waivers for a permanent pool, depth greater than three feet, and the construction of open basins without the required channel and sloped bottom. Concerns arose about the potential for standing water and the implications for security, leading to the suggestion of a fence and gated driveway. Despite these issues, all waivers were unanimously approved, with one granted on the condition that it would not set a precedent for future projects.

In addition to the Elm Street project, the commission discussed the A Street solar project, which required an assessment of new plans that included a subdrain network within the stormwater basin. The commission also touched on proposed modifications to existing stormwater basins, aimed at addressing ponding issues and aligning with state and local stormwater standards. The effectiveness of these modifications in managing total suspended solids and potential impacts on neighboring properties were debated, as was the need for site inspections and further review by other town departments.

The commission’s meeting also involved a discussion on the potential erosion risks due to the TSS removal in a basin and the speed of water flow out of drain pipes. A proposal from Weston and Sampson was authorized, subject to the approval of the Town Administrator. The Blue Wave Solar project’s site preparation and cleanup near Sunken Brook were updated, though there was some confusion about the report for the emergency visit and what had been completed.

A notable thread throughout the meeting was the existential debate about the Stormwater Commission’s role. Some members expressed concerns that the committee was deviating from its original purpose of maintaining stormwater infrastructure, with discussions veering into the committee’s effectiveness in enforcing regulations and whether it should be disbanded or restructured. Complaints were raised about the committee being perceived as unprofessional and obstructive, prompting a call for realignment with its foundational goals. There was also confusion about a document related to stormwater permitting and inspection costs, highlighting a need for clarity on its intent and alignment with federal law.

The meeting ended with a consideration of the committee’s future. Concerns were also voiced about the town administrator’s involvement in decision-making processes and the overall functionality of the committee.