The most notable discussion of the evening revolved around a presentation by Brian Dunn from MBL Land Development and Permitting, who spoke on behalf of property owners Joe and Caleb Touch. They proposed to clear approximately 3.2 acres of land at 1280 and Pine Street for agricultural purposes. Dunn plans to transform the wooded area into grassland by clearing trees, removing stumps, and applying loam and seed. This proposal was notable due to its basis in agricultural exemption from the town’s stormwater bylaw, a point that prompted considerable discussion among the committee members.

The committee explored the regulatory implications of this exemption, as agricultural uses are not typically subject to the same stormwater regulations. Dunn highlighted a previous misunderstanding regarding a stormwater application that had been issued. The chair of the commission confirmed this misunderstanding, remarking, “if I had been contacted, I would have said no you don’t need to do that,” clarifying that agricultural activities do fall under exemptions in the regulations. This point underscored the importance of clear communication and understanding of regulatory requirements.

Concerns were raised about stormwater management practices during the land clearing process. Dunn assured the commission that best practices would be followed to prevent issues such as silt runoff, emphasizing the site’s natural ability to manage rainfall without affecting nearby properties. The intention to create a hay field, contingent on how the land is restored with seed and loam, was also clarified during the discussion.

Further deliberations touched on the potential future use of the land and its implications under Chapter 61, which governs land use and taxation for agricultural and forestry operations. The committee reached a consensus that any significant future changes would require additional regulatory scrutiny.

The meeting also highlighted the proactive role of residents in addressing potential stormwater issues. The chair expressed appreciation for public engagement, stating, “I think it’s great that the public says they notice,” and stressed the importance of providing timely responses to community concerns.

In addition to the agricultural exemption discussion, the committee addressed ongoing challenges in managing stormwater projects. A participant noted difficulties in obtaining updated stormwater figures from MACS, a contractor involved in local projects. The need for effective communication was stressed, especially as current channels through a project manager named Pete were found lacking. The committee highlighted the urgency of engaging with the correct personnel to ensure project progress.

An update was provided on a stormwater project review by Weston and Samson. A draft report by Theres Schwartz, received late the previous night, proposed potential changes to bylaws and regulations. However, the speaker noted that the town administrator would need to approve it since it was funded by grant money.

Another notable moment in the meeting was the announcement of a participant’s successful completion of the EPA construction inspection certification. This achievement, met with congratulations, involved five modules and an exam requiring a score of 80% or higher.

The meeting concluded with procedural matters, including the approval of previous meeting minutes and scheduling the next gathering for October 15th, where discussions about a pond and dam on Elm Street are anticipated. The meeting ended at 1:24 p.m. after a motion to adjourn was seconded and approved.