The comprehensive plan review was introduced by a representative from MetroCog, who presented its first draft. This plan is crucial as it outlines the city’s vision for development, infrastructure, and community needs. A central component of the discussion was the future land use map, which envisions the southeastern corner as a mix of high-density residential and commercial areas, while the northern parts are designated for commercial and light industrial uses. The recent discussions with the City of Moorhead about relocating an interchange on Interstate 94 have prompted considerations for adjustments to this map. The proposed interchange shift, moving it approximately half a mile west, raised significant questions about local development impacts and connectivity improvements, such as a potential overpass connecting to 14th Street. The council emphasized the need for collaboration with Moorhead to ensure that the development plans are seamlessly integrated. The uncertainty surrounding the interchange’s final design led to a call for flexibility in the city’s future land use plans as the situation evolves.

Transportation considerations were also a major topic. The council reviewed a safety action plan that identified high injury networks using crash data from the past five years. Public input highlighted a demand for improved walkability and infrastructure for bicycles and pedestrians. Discussions included accommodating electric bikes and future transportation trends, with suggestions for narrower road designs to reflect these changes. The council discussed the necessity of including evolving transportation methods in planning documents, emphasizing the importance of these considerations in shaping Dilworth’s future.

In addition to transportation, the council delved into housing policies, presenting four key objectives: offering a variety of housing types, promoting quality, addressing senior and special population needs, and encouraging infill and redevelopment. A council member highlighted the importance of incentives for affordable housing, mentioning existing tax abatements and the underutilized potential of tax increment financing. The discussion touched on accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and tiny houses as means to increase housing density. The potential requirement for ADUs at the state level was mentioned.

Economic development was another critical focus. The council explored strategies to support local business growth and expand employment opportunities. They stressed the importance of collaborating with the Chamber of Commerce and promoting development along key corridors such as Highway 10. The need for clarity in the comprehensive plan’s language was underscored.

The council also discussed revisions to an ordinance concerning the storage of inoperable vehicles, trailers, and recreational equipment. Clarification was sought on the definition of “inoperable,” with concerns about enforcement discretion. The conversation included how trailers are counted for regulatory purposes and addressed potential sidewalk obstructions by parked vehicles, particularly RVs and trailers that might impact visibility and safety at intersections.

Another topic was the proposed outdoor storage regulation ordinance, which was moved forward with a call for a public hearing. The council also considered the 2025 border city tax credit program, discussing potential tax credits for two local businesses, West Main Pizza and U Haul, and the possibility of adjusting the program to better support long-standing community businesses.

The meeting concluded with updates on building permits and ongoing community projects, such as the community center project, emphasizing the importance of public participation in the planning process. The council expressed concerns about previous low public turnout and discussed strategies to enhance engagement, including the possibility of sharing preliminary plans online to garner interest and feedback.