Doral City Council Approves $21 Million Settlement in Long-Standing Litigation Case

The Doral City Council convened to address several matters, most notably a resolution to settle a protracted legal dispute involving the city and Dural 10 LLC. This settlement, totaling approximately $21 million, was necessitated by a federal court ruling unfavorable to the city regarding a road project on 102nd Avenue.

0:00The litigation began in 2019 when the city’s contractor allegedly contaminated property owned by Dural 10 during the course of the project. Facing an adverse ruling, the city negotiated a settlement that includes purchasing the land from Dural 10 for around $17.2 million. Additional funds will come from JVA Engineering and the city’s insurance provider, bringing the total settlement to $21 million. The city attorney presented the resolution, acknowledging its imperfections but highlighting its importance in protecting the city’s interests. Council members expressed unanimous support, with one member commending the legal team’s efforts before the resolution was approved through a unanimous vote.

Moving forward, the Council examined a series of public hearing items, starting with a resolution for UF Communications LLC’s site plan on Northwest 102nd Avenue. This plan, part of a larger luxury vehicle storage facility project, required a land use amendment and zoning change from business to industrial. The planning and zoning director explained that the proposed development includes a one-story storage building, a central showroom, and an office structure, emphasizing that the site plan would enhance stormwater management with a bio-retention area.

The director argued that the zoning change would result in reduced traffic and less impact on the surrounding industrial area, which has not seen significant zoning updates since 2003. The Council supported this recommendation, approving the land use amendment, zoning change, and site plan after a detailed presentation.

15:28In budgetary matters, the Council discussed and approved a budget amendment for the fiscal year 2024-2025. This amendment was necessary to accommodate rising project costs and address unexpected expenses. A particular point of discussion involved the removal of $150,000 from the budget earmarked for an attorney, which the city attorney clarified had not been formally committed. This budget amendment was eventually passed, though not without dissent from one Council member who voiced concerns about the allocation of over $250,000 to the mayor’s office for new positions.

These positions included a communications and protocol coordinator, a constituent services coordinator, and a Hispanic outreach coordinator, with salary ranges discussed. Despite the concerns, the positions were justified as necessary for enhancing constituent services and were intended to assist the entire council. The budget amendment was passed following a thorough discussion of these roles.

The Council also passed a resolution addressing job descriptions and salary scales, which led to questions about the duties of the sergeant-at-arms, particularly regarding transportation for city officials. It was clarified that this requirement would arise only when safety and security risks necessitated it.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: