The meeting primarily focused on the behavior of Max the German Shepherd, owned by Mr. William Mun. The board examined complaints regarding the dog’s aggressive behavior, which have stirred significant concern among neighbors. Testimonies from residents described instances where Max allegedly attacked other dogs and posed a potential threat to pedestrians. Mr. Mun, who has recently undergone knee surgery and faces mobility challenges, defended Max’s behavior by providing a petition from neighbors and letters from a veterinarian attesting to the dog’s good temperament. He also outlined measures he planned to implement, such as increasing the height of his property fence and keeping Max leashed when outside. Nonetheless, community members expressed skepticism, citing past incidents and emphasizing the need for more actions.

The board’s deliberations highlighted a divide between those who view Max as a well-behaved dog and those who fear for community safety. Board members underscored the importance of accountability in dog ownership, with one member commenting on the necessity of taking responsibility for the dog’s actions. The board deliberated imposing specific conditions on Mr. Mun, including installing a chain-link fence, ensuring the dog is leashed and muzzled when off the property, and committing to further training for Max. The owner’s personal challenges, including health issues that delayed the dog’s neutering and training, were acknowledged, but they did not deter the board’s decision to act decisively for public safety.

Ultimately, the board unanimously voted to declare Max a nuisance dog. The motion required the owner to implement several measures, such as erecting a fence by August 1st, ensuring Max undergoes training, keeping the dog leashed and muzzled off-property, and completing the dog’s neutering within a specific timeframe. The board also mandated a follow-up in three months to assess the situation’s progress.

In addition to the discussion about Max, the board addressed the removal of two Norway spruce trees in front of the town hall. Concerns were raised about the trees overshadowing the building’s aesthetic appeal. The board considered the idea of replacing them with smaller, native species that would complement the town hall’s appearance. The topic sparked a broader conversation about community traditions, with members reminiscing about historical events involving tree removal.

The meeting also covered updates on property matters, such as the decision not to purchase a property on High Street, following the Community Preservation Committee’s review. The board discussed a potential land donation from an anonymous donor, which required further exploration regarding its tax implications and status. Furthermore, they addressed a request from a resident for a no-truck sign, deciding against pursuing it based on the evidence.

A more concern involved a property on Pleasant Street, where suspicions of illegal occupancy and waste disposal raised health and safety issues. The board agreed to include this matter in their next meeting agenda, emphasizing the need for collaboration among town departments to address the situation effectively.