The meeting also addressed the town’s FY 2025 operating budget, especially following a recent failed override. The board debated the recommendation to reduce certain budget lines to strengthen the town’s financial position in upcoming years, with a specific focus on the potential challenges in fiscal year 2026. This conversation highlighted the importance of long-term financial planning, growth numbers, and budgetary policies.

A significant amount of time was dedicated to discussing various budget scenarios, particularly those relating to the school budgets and whether to implement reductions listed in scenario three, which stemmed from recommendations following the failed override. The debate included the possibility of adding back certain budget items, with an emphasis on the long-term sustainability of spending and the impact on operational needs. There was a discussion about the use of free cash and the possibility of putting money into stabilization, as well as the importance of finding ways to fund necessary capital expenses without relying on overrides or debt exclusions.

Concerning the municipal electrical aggregation, the board discussed the inclusion of detailed information in the draft and the need for careful consideration given previous experiences with aggregation companies. The conversation extended to the Municipal Electricity Aggregation program, which aims to provide residents with cost-saving options and renewable energy sources. The potential benefits for the community were weighed against the complexities and considerations involved in energy program decisions.

Additionally, the board deliberated on the letter of agreement with the police union concerning holiday and personal buyback, ultimately authorizing the chair to sign the agreement. The need for fair compensation amid short staffing and its impact on morale was a point of concern.

The allocation of funds for tennis court repairs was another topic of debate, where the cost and potential usage of the courts were scrutinized before discussing the bidding process and need for a performance bond. On a related note, there was a discussion about whether the CPC funds should be used for restoring historic roadways.

Updates were provided on various town projects, such as the installation of electric vehicle charging stations, with the board issuing a Request for Proposal (RFP) and setting a proposal deadline. The funding from a state earmark, rather than local funds, was clarified. The board also received reports on the completion of the police station floor and growth mindset training.

The topic of the regional treasurer-collector’s office was raised, specifically the engagement of the Division of Local Services (DLS) in building the organization and concerns about the workload for the individual in this role.

The town’s preparation for its 350th anniversary was touched upon with the submission of a grant application to the Massachusetts Cultural Council to fund a block party-type event. Additionally, logistical plans for the annual town meeting were discussed, including the potential use of the cafeteria for its technological and sound advantages.

The meeting concluded with discussions on Memorial Day planning, a potential candidates’ night for upcoming elections, and ongoing deliberations regarding a project related to Brattle Street.