The superintendent search process emerged as the focal point of the meeting, with the board aiming to gather comprehensive community input through surveys and focus groups. However, concerns arose during public commentary that these discussions were being primarily held in closed sessions. One speaker urged the board to prioritize transparency, arguing that conversations about the qualifications and characteristics desired in a new superintendent should be conducted openly. The speaker emphasized that setting expectations privately could undermine public trust and engagement, which are important for a successful search.

Another speaker pointed out the urgency of the process, questioning whether it prioritized political convenience over a thorough, inclusive search that traditionally involves appointing an interim superintendent. The speaker warned that hastening the process could lead to continuity of past leadership cultures, which some community members found troubling. They called for the board to ensure integrity and openness to avoid repeating prior mistakes and to rebuild trust within the community.

Additionally, a community member advocated for the establishment of a sanctioned parent advisory group to foster collaboration and transparency. They stressed the importance of creating a genuine partnership between families and school leadership.

In other discussions, a speaker raised issues about the district’s curriculum pilot programs, questioning the board’s role and the transparency of these initiatives. The speaker called for clear policies on curriculum adoption and more public-facing conversations about such educational matters.