A detailed presentation was given on the aging sewer infrastructure in New City, a neighborhood developed by the West Boilston Mills in the early 1900s. The mills originally established underground utilities, but with their closure in the 1930s and 1940s, the land transitioned to private ownership. This historical shift left many sewer lines running through private properties, creating legal and logistical challenges for the city in terms of access for repairs and maintenance. The city currently lacks legal access to these lines, raising concerns about their functionality and upkeep.

The condition of the sewer lines, many of which are made of clay and approximately a century old, was a primary focus. Issues such as root infiltration due to cracks were identified, necessitating rehabilitation. The proposed solution involves “curing in place piping,” a non-invasive method that uses cameras to detect blockages, clears out roots and sediment, and installs a liner that adheres to the existing pipe. This approach is cost-effective and avoids the financial burden on homeowners that would result from relocating sewer lines to roadways.

During the meeting, five specific locations in New City were identified where sewer lines cross private property. The city plans to secure legal access by requesting easements from property owners. These efforts are prioritizing the legal aspects now to allow for smoother future maintenance. The city does not anticipate beginning the actual work on these lines until 2027, but emphasizes the importance of resolving legal issues well in advance.

Notably, a resident named Jill Corbin raised a question during the public comment segment about a pipeline running between Oakdale Place and Ferry Street. She inquired about the possibility of designating a paved but unnamed road in the area as a city road as part of the infrastructure project. This dialogue highlighted the intricate relationship between road ownership and infrastructure development in older neighborhoods.

The meeting also touched on the broader implications of the sewer project for local residents. There was discussion about the rights to travel over a road that, while used by the public, is technically private property. Clarification was provided on the legal processes required for any changes, which would require agreement from property owners to relinquish parts of their property. The council emphasized its intent to avoid undue disruption to individual property owners while maintaining the municipal sewer system effectively.

Concerns about the potential impact on individual properties were addressed, with assurances that only a few parcels would experience any ground disturbances due to pipe repairs or manhole work. Most access to the pipes would be through surface manholes, minimizing the need for digging. Temporary disruption to sewer services was noted, requiring residents to refrain from using water for approximately six to eight hours during repairs. The repairs aim to extend the life of the pipes by 50 to 100 years.

The discussion included the potential for existing structures like sheds or garages near easement areas, with reassurances that issues would only arise if maintenance was needed directly beneath such structures, a scenario described as uncommon.

Another participant raised a personal concern about the lack of curb cuts on their streets, limiting access and complicating deliveries. They expressed support for creating a road behind their houses to improve access. The participant also sought historical context about their neighborhood, revealing a lack of awareness about its past, including a name change from Brook Street to Emerald Place. They were directed to contact Johanna for further information.