Easthampton City Council Takes Stand Against Battery Storage Systems to Protect Water Supply

The Easthampton City Council meeting held on April 16, 2025, focused on several issues, with the most significant being a resolution opposing the installation of lithium battery energy storage systems (BESS) in nearby Westfield due to potential risks to the region’s water supply. The council also tackled discussions on financial appropriations, pedestrian safety, and the promotion of arts and culture within the city.

01:16:24The council’s opposition to the proposed battery storage systems by Jupiter Power, a subsidiary of BlackRock, stemmed from concerns about environmental and safety risks. A resident from Overlook Drive voiced apprehensions about the installation of 219 standalone lithium battery storage systems, citing previous incidents in New York and California where such systems caught fire, releasing toxic smoke and necessitating evacuations. The resident emphasized the potential dangers these systems pose to the Connecticut River Valley, given its unique geological features. The council’s resolution highlighted the critical importance of clean water and the potential threats posed by the BESS projects near the Barnes Aquifer, which could impact Easthampton’s water supply.

The council expressed unanimous opposition to the construction of any BESS projects in Westfield, invoking Article 97 of the Massachusetts Constitution, which guarantees clean air and water as a right. They called for oversight and caution regarding these projects, particularly due to their proximity to vulnerable populations such as assisted living facilities and schools. The resolution proposed the establishment of an aquifer task force to monitor the situation closely and demanded that developers of future BESS projects fund independent assessments to evaluate their effects on local drinking water supplies.

19:17In another development, the council addressed financial matters, including a supplemental appropriation of $20,000 from the general stabilization fund to cover unexpected legal expenses incurred during the fiscal year. The mayor explained the challenges in forecasting legal costs, which had been higher than in previous years due to various ongoing developments and negotiations. Although there was no formal recommendation on this appropriation, the council approved the motion, acknowledging the necessity of the funding.

27:28The meeting also featured discussions on a new ordinance aimed at improving pedestrian safety by regulating shrubbery maintenance. The ordinance sought to address visibility issues caused by overgrown plants that obstruct sidewalks and intersections, posing hazards to pedestrians and vehicles. The council emphasized a collaborative approach with property owners, favoring communication over penalties to resolve such issues. The ordinance, designed in collaboration with city departments, was well-received and aimed at enhancing public safety by providing clear guidelines for property owners regarding landscaping maintenance.

55:24The council further engaged in promoting arts and culture within the city. A presentation by Pascalina Azerello from the Easthampton Cultural Alliance (ECA) highlighted the ongoing collaboration between the ECA and city departments to integrate public art into community projects. The council acknowledged the importance of supporting local artists and fostering community engagement, with the ECA’s Futures Project being recognized as a vital living document that incorporates strategies to support affordable living and working spaces for artists.

01:03:47The meeting concluded with the council’s approval of a resolution supporting the ECA’s efforts, particularly in addressing issues such as gentrification and the need for affordable artist workspaces. The resolution celebrated the ECA’s contributions to enhancing the city’s vibrancy and fostering community engagement through arts and culture.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: