Easthampton Council Adopts Specialized Energy Code Amid Community Concerns
-
Meeting Type:
City Council
-
Meeting Date:
06/25/2024
-
Recording Published:
06/26/2024
-
Duration:
233 Minutes
-
Towns:
Easthampton
-
County:
Hampshire County
-
State:
Massachusetts
- Meeting Overview:
The Easthampton City Council recently convened to discuss a range of topics, with the adoption of a specialized energy code being a primary focus. This code is designed to regulate building design and construction for better energy use and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Slated to go into effect from January 1, 2025, the new regulations will specifically target new residential and commercial structures, including pre-wiring for electrification, solar installation requirements, and adherence to passive house standards for certain types of buildings.
The enactment of the specialized energy code aligns with the city’s efforts to achieve a climate leader designation, which involves meeting numerous criteria such as establishing a local energy committee and creating a decarbonization roadmap for 2050. The designation would potentially open doors to a broader range of grant opportunities to support the city’s climate goals. Furthermore, the council discussed the importance of adopting a zero-emission vehicle policy, which would require prioritizing zero-emission vehicles, including electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles, for municipal use. This policy was seen as a step towards meeting the city’s net-zero carbon emission targets by 2050.
The discussion around the specialized energy code was comprehensive, touching on its potential impact on new building construction costs, the incentives available to builders, and the code’s alignment with the already adopted stretch code. While the code primarily affects new constructions, there was clarification that it would not impact existing structures, renovations, or affordable housing projects. The council heard from various stakeholders, including the conservation agent, a representative from the Department of Energy Resources, and the regional coordinator of the Green Communities program, who provided insight into the implications of adopting the specialized code.
Another issue addressed at the meeting was the proposed rent increases at One Cottage Street, which houses artists and small businesses. The public comments section was charged with emotions as tenants and community members expressed their concerns over the rent hikes and their potential impact on local businesses and the artist community. The tenants called for stability, honesty, and fair prices, while also underscoring the importance of affordable workspaces for the sustainability of the arts in Easthampton. In response, the council passed a resolution in support of affordable artist workspaces, acknowledging the contribution of artists to the city’s economic development and revitalization.
A pressing matter that sparked debate among the council members and the community was the proposed removal of the public use provision for the Pepin school gym as part of the redevelopment of three schools. The Property Committee recommended removing the provision to facilitate the addition of affordable housing units. However, there were divergent views on the feasibility and financial responsibility of maintaining public access to the gym space. The council deliberated on the gym’s operational costs and the challenges of finding a viable entity to manage the space. Despite the community’s calls to preserve the gym for public use, a motion to remove the gym from the request for proposals (RFP) was ultimately put forth.
Other topics of discussion included the Traffic Rules and Order amendment, focusing on changes to parking regulations on Main and Union streets to address safety concerns. Additionally, the council considered appropriations for various city needs, such as legal costs related to ongoing union negotiations and contributions to the general and capital stabilization funds.
The Easthampton City Council’s meeting also encompassed a review of the Local Development Agreement (LDA) negotiation process. The discussion explored the challenges and complexities of negotiating provisions related to the public use of the gym space and the impact on affordable housing funding. The council heard from the mayor, city procurement officer, and city solicitor on the negotiation process. Furthermore, the council touched upon the municipal Electric aggregate plan, the climate action plan, and the housing Choice designation, emphasizing these steps’ significance in relation to the city’s overarching goals.
Nicole LaChapelle
City Council Officials:
Koni Denham, Brad Riley, Owen M. Zaret, Jason “JT” Tirrell, James Kwiecinski, Homar Gomez, Thomas W. Peake, Salem Derby, Tamara Smith
-
Meeting Type:
City Council
-
Committee:
-
Meeting Date:
06/25/2024
-
Recording Published:
06/26/2024
-
Duration:
233 Minutes
-
Notability Score:
Routine
Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:
-
State:
Massachusetts
-
County:
Hampshire County
-
Towns:
Easthampton
Recent Meetings Nearby:
- 01/02/2025
- 01/02/2025
- 40 Minutes
- 01/02/2025
- 01/02/2025
- 32 Minutes
- 01/02/2025
- 01/03/2025
- 67 Minutes