A significant portion of the meeting was devoted to a proposal that would allow charitable gaming, such as pull tabs, in Edina. Representatives from the Edina Education Fund and Edina Athletic Boosters argued for the introduction of these activities to generate additional revenue for local schools and athletic programs. They emphasized the potential benefits, noting that charitable gaming could provide much-needed funding to support 8,700 students, 5,600 families, and 1,600 staff members across the Edina public school system. The proposal aimed to fill budget gaps, particularly for school athletics and youth programs, which have been financially strained.

Kurt Lang of the Edina Athletic Boosters highlighted the financial challenges faced by high school sports teams, stating that many perceive Edina’s athletic programs as well-funded when they are not. He noted that the booster club supports numerous sports teams but lacks access to the Parent-Teacher Association revenue that benefits other communities. The initiative to allow charitable gaming was seen as a critical step in maintaining competitiveness and supporting various programs.

In support of the proposal, Bob Mohawk highlighted the success of charitable gaming in Minnesota, pointing out that over 1,100 nonprofits in the state benefit from such activities. He mentioned that Edina stands out as an anomaly among neighboring cities that allow pull tabs. The council discussed potential models for amending the current ordinance, with some members preferring a comprehensive approach over simple exemptions.

While the council appeared open to the idea, there were concerns about the inclusivity of the proposed ordinance and whether organizations like the Edina Hockey Association would be eligible to participate. The representatives assured that any nonprofit meeting the Minnesota Gambling Control Board’s criteria could benefit. Some council members expressed support for replacing the ordinance rather than making exceptions.

Gun control was another major topic, sparked by recent tragic incidents and a ordinance passed in St. Paul. The ordinance aimed to enhance local gun regulation contingent upon the lifting of state preemption laws. The council deliberated on adopting a similar ordinance in Edina, with differing opinions on its necessity and potential legal challenges. One council member noted the importance of acting independently when state lawmakers are unresponsive, while another raised concerns about the ordinance’s enforceability due to state law limitations.

The proposed ordinance included provisions for safe storage and addressed military-style weapons, ghost guns, and high-capacity magazines. However, concerns were raised about the legal risks associated with adopting such measures. Council Member Agno suggested separating safe storage provisions into a distinct ordinance, which could be enacted immediately without state preemption challenges.

Council Member Pierce criticized the ordinance as “passive,” proposing the drafting of two separate measures: one containing enforceable actions and another acknowledging state constraints. Discussions included the idea of a public hearing to engage residents on gun ownership rights and safety, emphasizing the need for community dialogue.

The meeting also addressed development projects, including the replatting of the former Macy’s furniture store site by Enclave Companies. Concerns were raised about the financial viability of the project, particularly regarding Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and its impact on future property taxes. Public comments highlighted skepticism about proceeding with the subdivision without securing property ownership and financing.

Miss Coats, a resident, voiced strong opposition, questioning the project’s financial backing and warning of increased taxpayer levies. The council decided to close the public hearing on the matter and continue the discussion at the next meeting. They also discussed the host approval for revenue bond issuance by the city of Oakdale.