The Sacred Foundation’s proposal to establish a Hindu temple at a site designated for industrial use prompted extensive discussion about traffic and parking implications. The proposed use requires a D1 variance, as religious services are not permitted in the RARI zone. The foundation’s representatives characterized the religious use as beneficial and unlikely to negatively impact the neighborhood. A traffic engineer presented a study indicating minimal impact, projecting the temple would add only about 10 vehicles during peak hours. However, this sparked concerns about potential traffic congestion and parking overflow.

The board scrutinized the proposal’s adherence to police recommendations, particularly regarding traffic management. A police report suggested a one-way exit onto Park Gate Drive, but the applicant faced challenges implementing this due to existing agreements with the landlord. The applicant committed to directing congregants to use a southern entrance, avoiding Park Gate Drive. Yet, questions persisted about the efficacy of these measures and the potential delays for vehicles exiting onto Park Avenue.

During the meeting, a board member requested that further data on traffic delays be submitted for future consideration. The applicant’s representative agreed to provide the additional information, acknowledging that the initial report lacked detailed traffic analysis.

The board also discussed an existing restrictive covenant prohibiting access through a shared road with adjacent properties. A condominium association member raised objections, highlighting potential safety and traffic issues. The board decided to review the covenant and emphasized its importance in guiding their decision-making.

Another issue arose over parking calculations, which had been based on industrial use assumptions. A board member noted that any change in use could necessitate reevaluation of parking needs, especially since the temple could potentially draw more attendees than anticipated. The applicant assured the board of ample parking availability but acknowledged the need for continued monitoring.

In addition to the house of worship application, the board approved a use variance for a residential addition on Manor Boulevard. The applicant’s proposal to build a master bedroom suite over an existing garage was supported by testimony from a licensed planner, emphasizing minimal impact on the neighborhood’s aesthetics. Local residents expressed support, noting consistency with other two-story homes in the area.

The board also addressed the procedural aspects of zoning governance. They emphasized the necessity for members to remain neutral and adhere to the Municipal Land Use Law’s guidelines, maintaining objectivity in their quasi-judicial roles.