30:57The meeting’s most pressing topic was the situation on Fielding Place, where survey discrepancies led to significant construction challenges. The case involved Abishek Barwage, who sought bulk variances for a single-family dwelling already under construction. The initial survey, conducted by Ken Hoffman in April 2024, failed to account for certain property monuments, leading to an incorrect placement of the foundation. A more accurate survey by Andrew Wu in July 2024 discovered these errors, revealing that the foundation was improperly located.

33:58The board delved into the details of the survey errors, questioning Wu and others about the timeline and the corrective measures taken. Wu explained that his survey, which was intended to provide a more accurate representation, found discrepancies with the original boundary lines. Despite Wu’s efforts to correct the initial survey, the construction had already progressed with pre-cast concrete walls and framing in place.

01:00:50The builder, Abishek Bahadwaj, and another involved builder, Victor Lopez, provided testimony about the construction progress and the actions taken upon discovering the error. Both emphasized that construction was halted immediately after the survey discrepancies were identified. Despite these assertions, board members expressed frustration over the timeline and the lack of review of site civil drawings before construction commenced. The board highlighted the significant cost implications of rectifying the foundation misplacement, with Lopez estimating around $230,000 to remove and reconstruct the foundation correctly.

50:06A notable point of contention was whether the survey errors could have been identified earlier. The board sought clarity on why the errors were not apparent until construction was well underway. Lopez explained the necessity of two surveys—one for general boundary lines and another topographic survey for identifying utility and tree locations. Despite these efforts, the errors only became apparent when the neighboring property owner initiated their construction plans, prompting a reassessment of the site.

01:27:39As the board continued to explore solutions, they requested additional documentation to understand the situation fully. This included comprehensive timelines of all surveys conducted, building construction documents, and permit plans. The board voted unanimously to carry the matter to a later date, allowing time for the compilation of necessary documents and further examination of the situation.

21:46In another significant case, the board reviewed a variance request for a new single-family dwelling on Terry A., involving Mayor Condwall. The applicant sought variances for total side yard, building height, and maximum lot coverage, all slightly exceeding zoning requirements. During his testimony, Mr. Condwall explained adjustments made to his initial plan based on board feedback, asserting that his proposal was an improvement over the existing structure previously granted a variance.

28:54Board member Mr. Dvet questioned Mr. Condwall about the existence of similar properties in the area, to which Mr. Condwall admitted he had not conducted thorough research. The discussion revealed concerns about the accuracy of the proposed plans and their alignment with neighborhood standards. Despite these concerns, the board ultimately approved the application, with six votes in favor and one against from Vice Chair Gorman.

18:17They emphasized the quasi-judicial nature of the board and the procedures for public comments.