01:29The primary focus of the meeting was the application from Lago Construction, which requested a waiver to construct a driveway on San Francisco Avenue. The property’s unique circumstances, such as the absence of a designated terrace, made it difficult to comply with existing land use ordinances that typically restrict front driveways. Charles Wilson, the attorney for Lago Construction, highlighted the necessity of the driveway for practical access, as natural vegetation obstructs other routes. He emphasized the importance of the driveway, noting that similar properties in the area have existing curb cuts onto San Francisco Avenue.

11:46A key point of debate was the condition of 13th Terrace, which some board members described as unimproved, lacking pavement or gravel. Others argued that utilities like water and sewer connect through the terrace. This discussion highlighted differing interpretations of what constitutes an “improved” street, affecting the decision-making process.

19:09Ultimately, the board approved the application as a waiver rather than a variance, citing the impracticality of accessing the lot from the unpaved terrace. The decision was made with unanimous support.

25:18Following the driveway discussion, the board turned its attention to the Creek subdivision redevelopment plan. The existing plan had expired six years prior, prompting the need for amendments to remove outdated references and update the list of acquired properties. The board recognized the necessity of conducting a study to determine if the area qualifies as in need of redevelopment, which would grant the city more flexibility in working with developers.

27:10Board members discussed potential changes to the plan, emphasizing the importance of maintaining current density levels due to Pinelands regulations. The existing street grid and stormwater management facilities were identified as economically unfeasible for developers, leading to talks of reconfiguring the layout. These discussions included shifting home orientations around detention basins to enhance economic feasibility and compliance with stormwater management regulations.

34:06The conversation also touched on the recreation ordinance, with debates about requiring developers to provide recreational facilities within their projects. Some board members expressed concern that developers might prefer to pay fees rather than build amenities, potentially leading to a lack of community facilities. The board recognized the importance of balancing developer interests with community needs to foster vibrant neighborhoods.

40:19As the meeting progressed, attention shifted to ongoing council matters and public comments, including concerns about business upkeep along the White Horse Pike.