One of the most discussions of the meeting revolved around the persistent drainage issues affecting various streets in the village, particularly highlighted by long-time resident Marlin Brooks. Brooks, a resident of 90th Street, addressed the council, describing how heavy rainstorms transform her street into a “river,” impacting her quality of life and creating a mosquito breeding ground. She urged the council to allocate unspent funds from 2021 to address these drainage problems, stressing the urgency and her frustration over the lack of progress after years of raising the issue. Brooks pointed out that her calls to 311 for mosquito control had been ineffective, and she expressed disappointment over increasing property taxes without corresponding improvements in infrastructure. The council acknowledged the widespread drainage problems, partly attributing them to residents paving over easements, and confirmed that the ongoing stormwater master plan is progressing in phases because of funding constraints. They noted that addressing the drainage concern is one of the village’s most significant challenges.

In response to Brooks’ concerns, a member suggested exploring an incentive program that would encourage residents to invest in infrastructure improvements, such as installing French or vertical drains. This proposal included the idea of offering financial incentives, similar to state-level home grant programs, to support residents in implementing cost-effective do-it-yourself drainage solutions. The council emphasized the importance of community involvement in addressing infrastructure issues, though solutions require time and resources currently constrained by the village’s budget.

Another notable topic was the removal of a proposed light rail train stop from planning maps, initially considered for the 79th Street area in El Portal. The council expressed frustration over the lack of public hearings and community input on this matter. The removal was attributed to insufficient density in the area, despite previous lobbying efforts by a former commissioner to include the stop. The council discussed the missed opportunity and the planning decisions that failed to favor El Portal, reflecting on the broader implications for the community’s connectivity and development.

The council meeting also addressed the budget for public affairs, revealing a $20,000 allocation primarily for the state of the village address and Arbor Day events, which are necessary to maintain the village’s Tree City USA status. A council member highlighted the importance of meaningful partnerships to execute events without heavily relying on the budget.

Community engagement was further emphasized through discussions about discretionary funds, which, if unused, are returned to the village budget for potential reallocation. A council member shared their experience with a free yoga program aimed at families, which had low attendance despite hopes for community participation. They remained optimistic about the program’s future impact, reiterating the importance of creating environments for residents to connect outside budgetary discussions.

Animal control was another area of concern, particularly regarding the overpopulation of cats and peacocks within the village. A resident inquired about the possibility of implementing a catch-and-release program to manage the cat population. The council noted that while such efforts had been initiated by a previous resident, they ceased due to a lack of county support.