One notable issue addressed during the meeting involved homeowner Julie Ricks, who filed a complaint against Mr. Hunter on August 6, 2024. Ricks contracted Hunter for a $66,000 project, providing a $35,000 down payment. She alleged that shortly after work began, she experienced numerous issues, including unapproved changes and a lack of communication. Ricks terminated Hunter’s services on August 5 after observing various project problems. It was revealed that Hunter did not compensate a material supplier, prompting Ricks to pay a subcontracting crew out of her own pocket. She provided documentation supporting her claims, which the board moved into evidence.

Ricks expressed her frustration to the board, emphasizing her financial losses and the lack of accountability for contractors like Hunter. She questioned why contractors could take client money without using it appropriately, highlighting the issue of fiduciary duty. The board members acknowledged the pattern of behavior and explained the limitations of their authority, emphasizing the importance of documenting financial damages, which would be crucial in moving forward.

The board also addressed a complaint from homeowners Jeffrey and Cynthia Hindenburg, who entered into a $94,000 contract with Hunter. They reported paying significant deposits, including a progress payment of $115,000, yet faced issues when the roofing contractor was not paid, leading them to make additional payments directly to suppliers. The Hindenburgs voiced their dissatisfaction with the lack of communication and the project’s stalled progress, providing a timeline of events and additional payments made to keep the project moving.

The board discussed escalating the matter to the state’s attorney for further action once the case was officially moved to a disciplinary hearing. The Hindenburgs articulated their concerns about the financial implications and lack of accountability, stressing that they had paid nearly the full contract amount without receiving adequate service.

Another homeowner detailed their financial and structural issues stemming from Hunter’s alleged failure to complete work. They discussed an initial deposit of $68,000, additional payments for framing and roofing, and challenges related to a lien placed by a lumber supplier. The homeowner faced difficulties obtaining insurance due to incomplete work, including the absence of windows and siding. The board members emphasized the need for the homeowner to compile a list of additional damages to assist in decision-making regarding disciplinary action.

The board’s decision to initiate disciplinary action against Hunter based on three identified code violations marked a step toward addressing these issues and offering potential relief to the affected homeowners.