A central focus of the meeting was the comprehensive plan update, presented by Ray Greer of Design West. This update, mandated by statutory processes every seven years, includes a shift in the planning horizon from ten years to twenty, extending to 2046. The comprehensive plan’s future land use element was highlighted, containing all relevant categories and policies. During the presentation, questions arose about the removal of outdated maps, particularly Map 19, with assurances given that no state pushback was anticipated.

The meeting also addressed concerns from attendees, such as Cindy Newton, a resident of unincorporated Eustis, who flagged discrepancies in projected water demand and sewage flow data within the plan’s supporting documents. She urged a review of these figures before submission.

As the agency deliberated whether to forward the comprehensive plan update to the city commission, some members expressed apprehension about the timeline for review. A member voiced a desire for more time to scrutinize the materials, stating, “I would like for it to have come to us earlier for us to really go through it and to spend time understanding because basically we’re proving something that we don’t have full knowledge of.” Despite these concerns, the agency proceeded with a vote to transmit the proposal, highlighting that any substantive issues could be addressed during the city commission’s review.

Discussion then shifted to a future land use map amendment proposed by Logan Wilson for Lambert Properties Group LLC. The proposal involved reclassifying approximately 5.5 acres from county urban low to mixed commercial industrial (MCI) with a suburban corridor design district assignment. The area, located in a flood zone with soil limitations, would require a letter map revision from FEMA for development to proceed.

This proposed amendment sparked public concern, particularly regarding its environmental impact on Trout Lake. A resident pointed out the area’s sensitivity, emphasizing the potential adverse effects of development on drainage and the surrounding ecosystem. The significance of Trout Lake as a conservation area was underscored, with members acknowledging the challenge of balancing development interests with environmental preservation. One member remarked, “I think we’re in a catch 22,” highlighting the complexities of managing the property responsibly while accommodating development pressures.

The agency explored the potential for a development agreement, noting its voluntary nature for applicants. While annexation cannot be conditioned on such agreements, recent instances were cited where property owners voluntarily sought agreements to align with city design guidelines.

As deliberations continued, a motion to transmit the proposal was made and seconded, resulting in a roll call vote in favor of proceeding. This decision allows for continued discussions and potential amendments during the state review process, anticipated to take approximately 90 days before adoption. The meeting concluded with a brief recess.