Superintendent Justin Smith presented the proposal, highlighting that Evesham Township is $15 million below the adequacy threshold. He emphasized the opportunity for the district to raise an additional local tax levy, with the state contributing 5% of the total amount collected. Smith recommended pursuing the full $14.9 million to bring the district to adequacy, stating, “The state is giving us this chance to save ourselves.” He detailed how the funds could be used to maintain existing programs and staff positions that had been previously reduced due to budget constraints, such as preserving elementary extracurricular activities, maintaining class sizes, and ensuring benefits for paraprofessionals.

A significant portion of the discussion focused on the need for infrastructure improvements, with Smith outlining the costs associated with replacing heat pumps and addressing aging facilities. The potential to avoid a lengthy bond referendum process by utilizing the additional tax levy was also considered crucial for timely upgrades. Board members raised questions about the state’s definition of adequacy and how it determines the local fair share of funding, with concerns over the historical decisions that led to significant state funding cuts.

The meeting also delved into the implications of living within previous budgetary constraints, where past decisions to operate within means resulted in financial challenges. The debate centered on the board’s fiscal responsibility versus the necessity to ensure adequate funding for educational services, with Smith framing the decision as critical for the board and community. Public comments further emphasized the importance of maintaining the middle school team model and ensuring adequate teacher contact time with students.

Additional discussions highlighted the impact of the S2 funding cuts and the potential tax increase on the average assessed household to cover the current $7.1 million deficit. The board considered whether the full $15 million levy was necessary, with some members advocating for a balanced approach to resolve budgetary issues without overburdening taxpayers. Concerns were raised about the potential hindrance this levy could pose for future bond referendums, as well as the necessity of addressing capital improvements, particularly roof replacements at Rice and Deacy schools.

The board also evaluated the roles and responsibilities of proposed new administrative positions, such as assistant principals, amid concerns about affordability. Some argued that these positions were necessary for supporting teachers and students, while others questioned the financial burden on taxpayers. A defense was made for the current administrative structure, described as the leanest among K-8 districts in the state.

Concerns were raised about the potential privatization of the transportation department, with bus drivers and aides expressing fears over job security and the safety of students. The discussion revealed apprehension about outsourcing, with speakers emphasizing the dedication of long-term employees and potential negative effects on service quality.