07:08One of the most notable discussions during the meeting revolved around the recreation survey conducted from January to March. The survey gathered responses from approximately 170 residents and aimed to assess community satisfaction with local parks and recreation services. Satisfaction levels with the overall recreation program were generally positive, though there were calls for further improvements in programming and engagement.

19:23A notable proposal from the survey discussion was the introduction of a “phone-free” policy at recreational events. This idea was put forward as a way to encourage more social interaction and reduce screen time for children. The suggestion garnered mixed reactions, but many in attendance acknowledged its potential benefits. Another idea that gained traction was organizing a community event similar to a fishing derby, which could involve activities like crabbing. This proposal was seen as a way to engage families and foster a lasting appreciation for local recreational opportunities.

22:45Despite the positive feedback, the survey results also highlighted areas needing attention. Communication methods were identified as a key area for improvement, as 33 respondents were unaware of the existing recreational e-blast list despite participating in the survey. This disconnect pointed to the need for revisiting how information about recreational programs is disseminated. Additionally, the survey was described as “youth heavy,” prompting discussions about better catering to senior residents in future surveys and ensuring broader representation.

In response to the survey findings, the council considered whether to conduct similar surveys annually or biannually to continually gather community feedback. There was a consensus on the importance of consolidating information about current recreational programs and their funding.

34:19In addition to the recreation survey, the council discussed several ordinances. Among them were fee exemptions and special emergency appropriations for master plan preparation, both of which were approved without public comment. In new business, an ordinance linked to a grant for improvements to Foreman Street was introduced.

36:27The meeting also featured a representative from the Fair Haven Historic Association, who expressed their intent to donate funds for a planned borough feature. The association’s goal was to complete the project in time for the commission’s upcoming birthday, and they sought the council’s involvement in planning, including consultations with landscape architects and cost assessments.

37:41Community safety was another topic of concern, with questions raised about any potential increase in local incidents. While specifics were not detailed, the discussion emphasized the need for programs in local schools that promote positive interactions among youth, reflecting ongoing concerns about community dynamics.