At the forefront of the agenda was the transformative renovation project proposed for the historical property located on River Road. The architect detailed an extensive range of enhancements aimed at both preserving and modernizing the building. Key features of the renovation included the reconstruction of the staircase at the back of the building, the enclosure of the porch, and the addition of brickwork to complement the existing chimney. To maintain the historical aesthetic, clabber siding was chosen. The landscaping strategy is to incorporate native plant species while removing overgrowth.

Accessibility improvements were a notable aspect of the renovation, with plans to add additional bathrooms and modify the front railing to accommodate all visitors. The commission members were unanimous in their approval of the proposed changes. Discussions delved into the specifics of architectural details such as the style of the shutters to be used, the preservation of the eaves, and the design of the cornice. Members were content with the renovation plan, highlighting its thorough and detailed approach.

Another discussion point was the restoration of a chapel and an accessory building. The commission evaluated the aesthetic and structural elements, including the use of corbels and the selection of materials for shutters. There was a focused debate on the proportion and design of the porch columns. The members sought greater detail and clear limitations in the restoration plans while considering the cost differences between proposals from various professionals. The commission’s desire was to ensure that the restoration remained true to the historic character of the buildings while incorporating necessary repairs and updates.

Vegetation maintenance was addressed following an arborist’s report, and the commission planned a site visit to assess the required actions. The group also tackled the logistics of integrating Zoom into their meetings to encourage public participation while preferring to continue in-person meetings for the detailed review of large artifacts. Deliberations included how to effectively manage interactions between the board, the audience, and the public, with considerations about allowing the public to use their cameras during the sessions.

The commission also discussed operational aspects, such as the need for a complete roster of members and the progress of a committee specifically appointed to oversee work on G Road. Details were shared about the project’s phases and the necessary coordination with relevant agencies. The meeting concluded with a comparison of data collection and planning processes for Williams Road Park.