In an extensive discussion, the council weighed options for managing the increasing deer population. Biologists outlined factors influencing deer population size, such as birth and survival rates, natural and human-caused deaths, and immigration. Various management options were presented, including lethal and non-lethal methods. Lethal means, such as managed and contracted hunting, were debated for their efficiency and immediate impact on population control, with the potential benefits of providing food for the needy and requiring land management buy-in. Non-lethal methods discussed included trapping and relocating deer, birth control, and fencing. The challenges of these approaches, such as stress on the deer, mortality rates, and financial costs, were highlighted. The council also considered the ethical implications and the need for balance in choosing an appropriate strategy.

The debate extended to the impact of both lethal and non-lethal methods on deer migration patterns, the importance of local action without waiting for neighboring municipalities, and the practicality of hunting regulations, including the use of tree stands and public awareness. The council emphasized considering the implications of different methods on deer behavior and population dynamics. The importance of local leadership taking action to address public health and safety concerns related to the deer population was underscored, with discussions on the frequency and methods of deer management.

The meeting proceeded with the presentation of an Eagle Scout project, proposing the installation of a bike repair station at Fair Haven Fields. The council raised questions about the project’s funding and location, with the presenter outlining a fundraising plan and the advantages of the proposed location, including surveillance cameras. The council further approved the installation of signs for the Fair Haven Farmers Market and a request from the Fair Haven PTA to hold a Color Run event aimed at enhancing social-emotional learning and group play for local schoolchildren.

Amid these discussions, there was a notable debate over resolution 125 concerning the revocation of a volunteer’s position. Public comments voiced concerns regarding the lack of transparency and the absence of a clear explanation for the decision to remove the volunteer from the Environmental Commission. Community members called for justification and clarity on the decision-making process, reflecting on the importance of maintaining expertise in addressing environmental challenges.

The 2024 Municipal budget was another focal point, with the mayor noting a projected tax bill decrease for the average assessed home and a tax rate decrease. Funds were allocated for capital projects, including police vehicles and art initiatives. The council discussed the importance of monitoring the pay-as-you-go balance to ensure sufficient funds for approved projects, along with a proposal for a long-term parking lot project estimated to cost around $250,000.

The council also introduced ordinances for resident protection, which passed unanimously, and discussed proposals for Bicentennial Hall repair plans. The “Good of the Borough” segment attracted public comments on property maintenance ordinances and the need to review their impact on private property rights. Upcoming community events, such as fundraisers and Fair Haven Day, were mentioned, with positive feedback on leaf and brush collection.