Fair Haven Council Prioritizes Grant Applications for Park and ADA Upgrades Amidst Community Concerns

The recent Fair Haven Borough Council meeting focused on securing grant applications for significant local improvements, including ADA upgrades and park enhancements, while addressing community concerns about safety, aesthetics, and communication transparency. The council discussed the Monmouth County Development Block Grant application for ADA improvements and a Municipal Open Space Grant for park developments, both aimed at enhancing accessibility and infrastructure within the borough.

03:53A major topic of discussion was the application for the Monmouth County Development Block Grant, with an anticipated amount near $200,000, which targets ADA improvements at an aging local facility originally built in 1963. The council underscored the significance of these upgrades, noting the facility’s lack of previous ADA improvements, which limits eligibility for the grant. The focus will be solely on the targeted facility for ADA enhancements, excluding any concession stands due to restricted access requirements. The borough engineer informed the council and public that the project was part of a broader initiative that had been discussed in previous workshops.

10:37The council also explored a $2 million application for the Park System Municipal Open Space Grant, requiring matching funds. This project, discussed at recent open houses, aims to stabilize a local park damaged by Hurricane Sandy. Proposed enhancements include creating a living shoreline, additional green space, and improved accessibility and park features, such as a pavilion and pathways. While the concept plan is preliminary, the engineer noted it will undergo thorough design and engineering once funding is secured. The council emphasized the importance of public input, with potential adjustments to design elements like the amphitheater’s orientation to improve user experience.

23:12The meeting further delved into a potential project involving a living shoreline and a bulkhead for land stabilization, a historical necessity due to low tide impacts. The council discussed the merits of both structures, with concerns about unforeseen costs if decisions were delayed. Acknowledging the sensitivity of the Normandy area environment, the governing body planned to conduct traffic, parking, and environmental assessments, with resident feedback integral to the design refinement process.

Community engagement was a recurring theme throughout the meeting, particularly in the context of the living shoreline project and recent developments around neighborhood aesthetics. Residents expressed dissatisfaction with the visibility of a newly installed three-foot gas tank, which disrupted the visual coherence of their area. The council addressed these concerns by explaining landscaping efforts, including the strategic planting of “green giants” to obscure the tank over time. A council member reiterated their commitment to enhancing the neighborhood’s appearance, emphasizing the investment made in beautifying the area.

50:33The meeting also addressed stormwater management and drainage issues, particularly where a resident’s property experienced erosion due to a neighbor’s retaining wall runoff. The council acknowledged the resident’s frustration and suggested further investigation upon receiving detailed information via email. Additionally, concerns about the security implications of reduced fence height around the public works area were discussed. The council clarified that the fence’s new design was intended to withstand weather conditions better than its predecessor.

01:04:54Another topic was the redevelopment of a fiscal parking lot, which sparked debate about safety and communication transparency. Residents felt uninformed about the project’s progress and expressed concerns over the transformation from a private to a public space. The council clarified that the parking lot remained under church ownership, and discussions about its development had been ongoing in public meetings. Despite assurances, residents urged the council to improve communication channels and consider a safety study given the lot’s proximity to residential areas.

Safety measures for the parking lot were explored, including potential additions like mirrors, speed bumps, and crosswalks. The council invited residents to provide feedback via email, emphasizing their openness to suggestions while clarifying that construction would proceed. The partnership with the church was also discussed, with specific provisions for lot usage during services and funerals.

01:26:55The meeting concluded with reflections on the borough’s response to a recent storm, praising emergency teams’ swift actions in clearing debris. There was also discussion about preserving historical elements within the borough, such as a transom from an African-American school, with plans to reinstall it in a community center to honor its historical significance.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly: