Fair Haven Historic Preservation Commission Approves Balcony Modification Amidst Design Debate

At the recent Fair Haven Historic Preservation Commission meeting, the commission approved a modification for a construction project on Normandy Avenue, which involved converting an attic window into a recessed balcony. The decision came amid discussions about architectural style and neighborhood consistency. The architect, representing homeowner Rhett Federo, argued that the alteration was a minor adjustment and necessary to comply with permit variance requirements. The balcony, designed to offer river views, sparked a debate among commission members over its compatibility with the house’s existing architecture. Ultimately, a suggestion to incorporate a smaller arch detail to blend with the residence’s gable was accepted, and the modification was unanimously approved.

27:55In another significant matter, the commission explored the possibility of reviving the century home plaque program, following an inquiry from Steven Saraf about his 118-year-old home on River Road. Saraf’s presentation detailed the home’s storied past, including notable former residents and community events held there. Elise Casey of the Fair Haven Historic Association explained that the plaque program had been dormant but was gaining renewed interest. The commission, while not directly involved in the program, offered support and assistance, emphasizing the importance of recognizing and celebrating local history. The conversation underscored the home’s narrative as interwoven with the broader history of the Fair Haven community.

43:35Attention also turned to the ongoing preservation efforts at Bicentennial Hall. The commission reviewed a proposal from the Goldstein partnership for ADA-related improvements, which had surpassed a financial threshold, necessitating competitive bidding. The contract was awarded based on competitive pricing, yet concerns were raised about the project’s scope, with some tasks, such as door and lock replacements, not explicitly listed. The commission stressed the importance of having a say in aspects of the building’s exterior, particularly paint color, which falls under their jurisdiction. Discussions also addressed remedial work in the basement to address water issues, with calls for a collaborative approach to landscaping in preparation for the town’s 250th anniversary.

01:22:41Further discussions delved into the historic Black Heritage Trail, with the commission working on an application for landmark designation of the historic chapel and school. The narrative highlighted the struggles of the local African-American community, with references to integration battles and the critical role of a black teacher in the school. The commission expressed interest in expanding the trail to include other significant sites, like a house listed in the “Green Book,” used by African-American travelers during segregation. This initiative aims to preserve and honor the community’s history.

01:13:08The meeting also included a brief consideration of the park development plans on Fair Haven Road, focusing on balancing neighborhood livability with the proposed design. The commission acknowledged the need for professional guidance to ensure the project’s success, highlighting the importance of a holistic approach to design, circulation, and parking concerns. The park’s design will incorporate terrace seating, bulkheads, and living shorelines, with the grant application process underway.

The evening concluded with a discussion on the importance of maintaining historical accuracy in restoration projects, particularly the color schemes of buildings with cultural significance. The commission emphasized the need for careful consideration in restoring African-American churches to reflect their historical context accurately. As the meeting wrapped up, a motion was made to approve the minutes from a previous session, smoothly transitioning the commission to its next tasks.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: